I also think it should return ubyte[].
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Lars Tandle Kyllingstad <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it should return ubyte[]. > > -Lars > > > > On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 16:17 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> This has come up in http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1482. >> Should std.file.read() return void[] or ubyte[]? There's one matter with >> assuming that void[] may contain pointers (which is not the case for >> something read from a file), so possibly ubyte[] is a more accurate type >> for describng raw bytes. >> >> What are the pros and cons of returning void[] vs. ubyte[]? >> >> >> Andrei >> _______________________________________________ >> phobos mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos > > > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos > _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
