"Robert Jacques" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The meta namespace has been proposed as a possible replacement for
> __traits, etc. i.e. meta.compiles() vs __traits(compiles, ). So a
> different module name might be appropriate.
I'll consider. BTW, will this really happen, or rather is it necessary?
IIRC, the proposal was against the ugly syntax. I think all the
existing __traits except compiles could be wrapped with library
templates with syntactic sanity and added flexibility. For example:
template getMember(alias Scope, string member)
{
alias Identity!(__traits(getMember, Scope, member)) getMember;
}
// This overload does partial application. Useful for staticMap etc.
template getMember(alias Scope)
{
template getMember(string member)
{
alias .getMember!(Scope, member) getMember;
}
}
Shin
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
