Please don't remove std.xml until we have a replacement. On 28 okt 2010, at 23:11, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> Some of the items I recall are: > > std.bind (There was something related to this, might have been removal) > std.boxer (std.variant) > std.date (std.datetime) > std.conv (std.convert) > std.socket/stream (going to have a new design) > std.xml (redesign, removal until good replacement?) > std.json > > At least some mention of what will happen to these should be placed in > the documentation. > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Brad Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: >> How about all the other parts that are intended to be deprecated but >> haven't been flaged as such? Same question applies. The json code >> shouldn't be singled out. >> >> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> >>> I agree that we should add a mention. Other opinions? >>> >>> Andrei >>> >>> On 10/28/10 2:14 CDT, Brian Schott wrote: >>>> The DMD 2.050 beta zip contains no mention of std.json being scheduled >>>> for eventual replacement. Is it really a good idea to have another >>>> release with this code included and no warning that it will eventually >>>> go away? >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> phobos mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos >> > > > > -- > Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it. > - George Bernard Shaw > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos -- /Jacob Carlborg _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
