On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:04:11 -0400, Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Thursday, November 04, 2010 11:55:47 Robert Jacques wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:34:58 -0400, Jonathan M Davis
<[email protected]>
wrote:
[snip]
> Regardless, I think that using a final,
> uninstantiatable class is the best way to create a namespace within a
> module in
> D at the moment.
That's essentially what you're doing except that it's a class rather
than a
struct. And since structs _have_ to be constructable (thanks to them
having to
have an init property), it works better to use a class which you can
stop from
being constructed.
Isn't that what @disable was for?
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
