Thanks. One quick comment, though. Are you sure this is right? I found this in D1 std.intrinsic and it seems inconsistent:
int bsf(uint v); int bsr(size_t v); On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Walter Bright <[email protected]>wrote: > See std.intrinsic for Phobos1. > > > > David Simcha wrote: > >> Will all the functions in std.intrinsic that now take uint take size_t, >> i.e. take ulong on 64? In other words, are they all designed to operate on >> machine words? >> >> Also, for functions that take pointers, where implicit conversion of uint >> -> ulong is not possible, will there be both a uint and a ulong version? >> >> _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos >
_______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
