That was an old list. As long as the author listed next to the module isn't the current author, we're good :-)
On Nov 16, 2010, at 3:49 AM, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote: > In the trunk, I already replaced base64 module. > > > Masahiro > > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 06:42:09 +0900, Sean Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > >> These are the modules that couldn't be moved to the Boost license for one >> reason or another. They should all be removed or replaced: >> >> base64 - Chris Miller >> loader - Matthew Wilson >> md5 - RSA Data Security >> openrj - Matthew Wilson >> perf - Matthew Wilson >> socket - Chris Miller >> socketstream - Chris Miller >> stream - Pavel Minayev >> >> On Nov 14, 2010, at 12:05 AM, SHOO wrote: >> >>> I think that it is important that we prioritize our to-do list. >>> >>> Therefore I think that firstly we should make a list. Next, it is necessary >>> for us to clarify the problem that each item has. >>> >>> I show following list the thing which I hit on: >>> - std.stream, I/O (replace, enhance) >>> - std.xml (replace?) >>> - std.json (replace?) >>> - std.datetime (replace, enhance) >>> - scope/RAII (replace, enhance) >>> - std.scoket / asio (replace) >>> - std.event (enhance) >>> - std.serialize (enhance) >>> - documents (enhance) >>> - std.process (enhance) >>> - std.path, std.file (enhance) >>> - pure (apply) >>> - nothrow (apply) >>> - @safe/@trusted/@system (apply) >>> - shared (enhance, bug fix) >>> - GC (enhance) >>> - std.container (enhance) >>> - opDollars (enhance, apply) >>> - and some voted bugs (bug fix) >>> (I only enumerate of the list at this stage, and omit the detailed >>> explanation.) >>> >>> Are there items else? >>> >>> -- >>> SHOO >>> >>> (2010/11/14 14:52), Jonathan M Davis wrote: >>>> We have several modules in Phobos which are supposedly going to be >>>> deprecated in >>>> favor of better implementations (std.stream, std.xml, std.json, etc). As I >>>> understand it, this is primarily because the code isn't being maintained, >>>> is >>>> poorly designed for D2 (possibly because it isn't range-centric or just >>>> hasn't >>>> been updated with D2-only features), and/or lacks a maintainer/champion. In >>>> addition to that, there's various types of functionality which should >>>> probably >>>> be in Phobos but haven't been done yet. >>>> >>>> The Phobos developers only have so much time on their hands, and some >>>> portion of >>>> this kind of work is going to need to be done by people who are not >>>> currently on >>>> the Phobos team. That, and we seem to be adopting the idea that the ideal >>>> situation is for each module to have a "champion" of sorts who is behind >>>> the >>>> module, working to fix bugs on it and make it better. >>>> >>>> So, I was wondering if what we should do is figure out what some of the >>>> modules >>>> are that we want in Phobos - and in particular the ones currently in Phobos >>>> which need to be overhauled - and then post on the main D list looking for >>>> people willing to take them on. We don't want to a flood of code that >>>> needs to be >>>> reviewed for inclusion in Phobos, but if we want to get a lot of this >>>> stuff done, >>>> we need more people working on it - particularly people who are really >>>> looking >>>> to focus on it and champion it. >>>> >>>> So, I'm suggesting that we identify the top priority module which aren't >>>> likely >>>> to be done by Phobos developers any time soon and see if we can get others >>>> in >>>> the D community to do them. In particular, it's a problem that we have >>>> several >>>> modules which we intend to replace. The longer that we wait, the more code >>>> that >>>> will be written using the old modules, and the more code which will break >>>> when >>>> they get replaced. >>>> >>>> - Jonathan M Davis >>> _______________________________________________ >>> phobos mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos >> >> _______________________________________________ >> phobos mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
