On Nov 16, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 14:45:39 Shin Fujishiro wrote: >> >> >> Yeah, I agree that suffixed Exceptions are very clear. I wrote it >> because std.concurrency has non-suffixed exceptions such as >> MessageMismatch, which are still clear thanks to negative terms >> embedded in their names. > > Well, then I'd argue that those exception classes should have their names > changed to include Exception, but the negative terms embedded in their names > do > make them work as they are. It's just inconsistent, and generally-speaking, > such > inconsistencies in a library should be avoided unless there's a good, > overriding > reason to have them.
Changing the name would create an inconsistency with TDPL. _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
