On Saturday 20 November 2010 14:52:37 David Simcha wrote: > Yeah, I checked this in even though it wasn't working on my computer. I > was getting a couple specific failures that weren't happening to anyone > else even before this revision (still trying to figure out why). I > figured if these changes broke anything I'd just revert them immediately. > > Given both the fact that some tests fail on my computer and nowhere else > and the seeming innocuousness of the changes I made and the fact that > they broke something, I'm thinking maybe the unit tests are too strict. > For example, my changes might have changed how constant folding is done, > resulting in the least significant few bits being screwed up or > something. Also, maybe subtleties of different hardware and/or > different operating systems and C runtimes has an effect.
Didn't you say that you were running 64 bit windows whereas Don said that he was running 32 bit windows? Could that be having any effect? - Jonathan M Davis _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
