On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:52:31 -0600 Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> wrote:
> These are reasonable arguments, and I'd agree a lot more if I didn't > also believe that bidirectional and random access of iota ranges is > extremely rare. So it looks like we're hurting the common case for the > sake of a potential but obscure and rarely realized generality. I agree. Python's "range" is similar to iota: I have never needed more than plain forward traversal, and never read any code that needs more. Denis -- -- -- -- -- -- -- vit esse estrany ☣ spir.wikidot.com _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
