On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 12:44:51 Lars Tandle Kyllingstad wrote: > I think this is a good rule. As you say, it is simple and easy to > understand, and it ensures no critical exceptions are "lost" somewhere > in a chain. I would be very dissatisfied if my program throws an Error > and it is caught (indirectly) by a catch(FileException) clause.
I concur. That would seem to be a good approach. Errors definitely shouldn't be buried just because of an exception chain, but if it's just a bunch of chained Exceptions, you should still be able to catch them. - Jonathan M Davis _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
