On Wednesday 12 January 2011 01:28:07 Brad Roberts wrote: > The new module will need to be added to the two .mak files before it'll be > properly built and tested. Pick a previously existing module and use it as > a pattern to follow. The two files are very different.
??? It was already in the mak files from the previous version. Or is there somewhere in there that it wasn't? It does build as part of the build if I run make -f posix.mak. > I expect fallout from a new file and a bunch of new code.. it's pretty much > inevitable. The core.time module exposed 4 new bugs in the 64 bit code > gen, but Walter and I got 'em isolated and fixed in fairly short order. > > Thanks for the hard work. Well, breaking 64-bit stuff is a bit different from having tests fail on Windows due to platform differences. Last time I ran the tests with wine though, they passed. Of course, the core.time tests did too, and they ended up failing on an actual Windows box, so go figure. It's a lot of code though, so it wouldn't surprise me at all if it the 64-bit stuff didn't handle it very well. The more code you're dealing with, the more likely you are to find a bug. I certainly found plenty of them while implementing it - just not in the 64-bit compiler, because I haven't done anything with that. - Jonathan M Davis _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
