On 2/10/2011 10:17 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > On Thursday 10 February 2011 22:06:35 Don Clugston wrote: >> Since the last release >> - A rather terrible appending regression was fixed (adequate grounds >> for an emergency release) >> - Some of the worst wrong code bugs have been fixed >> - A raft of other bugs have been fixed. >> - And we've switched to git! >> >> I really think we should be wrapping up a release now. > > I should probably be finishing up my latest fixes to std.datetime's docs > then, so > that they can go out with the next release (which will be the first one with > std.datetime). > > One thing that I'm wondering about though is the renaming of functions in > std.string to fix capitalization. There was talk of doing it, and there were > a > fair number of changes to the functions in there, moving stuff to std.array > and > the like, but I don't believe that any of the functions in std.string have > been > renamed yet. I would have thought that it would be desirable to rename them > at > the same time that so many functions were moved, since then it would > concentrate > all of those major changes and make them less painful in the long run. > > - Jonathan M Davis
There's still a ton of things left to break in phobos. I'm not too worried about trying to get them all in right now. I agree, let's get this release stamped out and move on to the next cycle. There's already been two beta's cut during this cycle, though I agree that a third would be a good idea to make it clear that unless someone speaks up about regressions that the next step is a release. Anyone have a good reason not to freeze checkins for the next beta on, saturday or sunday and hopefully release a day or two later? _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
