On 2/20/2011 5:25 PM, David Simcha wrote: > On 2/20/2011 8:20 PM, Brad Roberts wrote: >> Likely not hard to add, but I haven't seen a demonstrated community desire >> for them. There was one person with a subset >> of patches for netbsd. That said, if someone donates an account on a box, >> that'd be a step in the right direction. I'm >> trying to avoid accumulating a box per platform, though mostly failing at it. >> >> > > What's wrong with virtualization as a solution to the one-box-per-platform > problem? Just use your favorite OS as your > host, get a ton of RAM, and run all the rest in VMs.
It's a solution, but not a great one. The build runs are already cpu bound, so diving up the cpu's just means everything goes slower. _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
