Might this be a good point to split the downloads into OS-specific bundles? Like every other application/tool?
-Steve >________________________________ >From: Michel Fortin <[email protected]> >To: Discuss the phobos library for D <[email protected]> >Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 11:04 AM >Subject: Re: [phobos] OS X lib32? > >Le 2011-03-28 à 1:38, Walter Bright a écrit : > >> There's a conflict with the "mac way" and the "unix way". I'll have to agree >> with Michel that on the mac we should do it the mac way. > >By this, do I understand that the next release will return to using "lib" >instead of "lib32". If so, that's great. Thanks. > >Here's what I'll do on my side. I'll make an exception in my installer so that >if it downloads DMD 2.052 it automatically adds a symlink at "osx/lib" >pointing to "osx/lib32". This will make things work for this release. The >downside is that it won't work if the user installs DMD manually by unpacking >the archive at the right place, but if the next DMD release return to using >"lib" the problem will be limited to manual downloads of DMD version 2.052, >which shouldn't be too bad. > >-- >Michel Fortin >[email protected] >http://michelf.com/ > > > >_______________________________________________ >phobos mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos > > >
_______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
