Observation: We still have the 'etc' namespace with practically nothing in it.
On 29 March 2011 02:25, Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> wrote: > Problem is that we'd occupy two top-level namespaces instead of one. Right > now people know better than define a package called "std". From here onwards > they'd need to remember that both "std" and "experimental" are verboten. > > I wouldn't want to take the discussion much further, as I'm sure there are > many nuances of paint for this bikeshed. If you want top-level experimental, > go for it. > > > Andrei > > On 3/28/11 7:22 PM, Walter Bright wrote: >> >> I was thinking the latter... >> >> On 3/28/2011 5:10 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >>> >>> Yah. Would that be std.experimental or just experimental? I suggest >>> the former. >>> >>> Andrei >>> >>> On 3/28/11 7:05 PM, Walter Bright wrote: >>>> >>>> Called "experimental". Into this would go proposed new Phobos modules, >>>> such that they will go out with dmd releases. Once they've been in use >>>> for a while and prove themselves, then they can be moved into std (or >>>> dropped). >>>> >>>> This was proposed in the n.g. and seems to be well received. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> phobos mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos > > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos > _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
