On 1 apr 2011, at 04:49, Brad Roberts wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Walter Bright wrote: > >> On 3/30/2011 8:00 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: >>> These are intended to be general guidelines which are followed most of the >>> time but can be broken within reason (though hopefully that's relatively >>> rare). >>> >> >> I'd like to see this as changes (as necessary) to the D style guide >> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dstyle.html, not as something distinct and >> possibly in contradiction with it. > > I see the same thing happening this time that has happened during last > discussions. There's a core part that's agreed upon, but it's > overshadowed by the discussion about the parts that aren't, and nothing > happens. I highly suggest getting the agreed upon parts captured in an > appropriate doc. The above one would be fine by me. > > It's far easier to add rules to an existing list once it exists. > > My 2 cents, > Brad > > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
That sounds reasonable to do. Put in the things we can agree on and leave the rest out. -- /Jacob Carlborg _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
