Right. This discussion is about what those pull requests should actually do and why.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Michel Fortin <[email protected]>wrote: > Le 2011-04-21 à 16:16, David Simcha a écrit : > > > This is about the 16 billionth time someone has suggested "with" as a > > solution, and every time I am forced to point out yet again that with() > > doesn't cut it. > > I already regret suggesting "with" because this is not what this thread is > about. > > My original question is about whether I should make a pull request for the > 5 commits that bring @property enforcement as an experimental feature, or > whether I should extract the two commits that fix auto return problems and > make a separate pull request for them (which is a little more work for me). > > And also, per the thread's title, it's about whether any of that should be > part of the next release or not. > > Whether the -property switch enforces things correctly or not can be > decided and changed later. > > -- > Michel Fortin > [email protected] > http://michelf.com/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos >
_______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
