_______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
I'm looking to get rid of the global malloc lock for small memory
allocations. A major barrier to pulling this off within the current GC
design is the fact that Gcx is a struct, which suggests the possibility
of having more than one instance and makes it more difficult to create
thread-local objects. Is there any reason why we would ever want more
than one garbage collector instance? If not, why is Gcx a struct
instead of just a bunch of __gshared variables?
- [phobos] Gcx: Would we ever want more than one? David Simcha
- Re: [phobos] Gcx: Would we ever want more than one? Walter Bright
- Re: [phobos] Gcx: Would we ever want more than ... David Simcha
- Re: [phobos] Gcx: Would we ever want more t... Sean Kelly
- Re: [phobos] Gcx: Would we ever want mo... David Simcha
- Re: [phobos] Gcx: Would we ever wa... Brad Roberts
- Re: [phobos] Gcx: Would we eve... Jonathan M Davis
- Re: [phobos] Gcx: Would we... Brad Roberts
- Re: [phobos] Gcx: Would we... Jonathan M Davis
- Re: [phobos] Gcx: Would we eve... Sean Kelly
- Re: [phobos] Gcx: Would we... Robert Jacques
