On Mon, 30 May 2011 09:38:31 -0400, Lars Tandle Kyllingstad
<[email protected]> wrote:
My proposal for a new std.path is now ready for review, and it is my
understanding that the same is true for David's TempAlloc. Would it be
OK if we run the reviews in parallel? The two are completely
independent, and AFAIK TempAlloc is meant for druntime, not Phobos.
For the curious/impatient:
https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/blob/new-std-path/std/path.d
http://www.kyllingen.net/code/new-std-path/phobos-prerelease/std_path.html
-Lars
The reason reviews are run serially has nothing to do with whether they
are independent or not; it has everything to do with the limited number of
eyeballs available.
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
