Last year, I tried std.socket improvement(not finished).
http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/phobos/2010-July/001171.html
http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/phobos/2010-September/002321.html
If you try replacement, you may implement event module or
work cooperatively with other people (Probably Max and Jonas).
In the future, std.stream will be replaced with new stream module.
I think current std.socketstream should be removed.
One question:
Socket itself is not networking part. std.net.socket is good place?
Masahiro
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:09:06 +0900, Jose Armando Garcia
<[email protected]> wrote:
What is the status on std.socket and std.socketstream? I see a few
problems with std.socket. Here are some: it is not RAII, it uses
obsolete functions, and it is not thread safe. What about
socketstream? Does anyone use that thing? Is it even needed?
I am actually asking all these questions because I am thinking of
working on this next. Is someone already working on this?
If we decide to replace std.socket what should be the procedure? I am
thinking of probably deprecating std.socket and adding std.net.
Thanks,
-Jose
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
