Great! Does anyone want to volunteer as review manager and announce the review? Code and docs can be found here:
https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/blob/std-path/std/path.d http://www.kyllingen.net/code/new-std-path/phobos-prerelease/std_path.html -Lars On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 16:40 -0400, David Simcha wrote: > Dr. Kyllingstad, > > AFAIK nothing's in the review queue. As far as potential future > stuff, std.parallel_algorithm will be ready somewhat soon because I > decided to scale back the ambitions for it to only algorithms that can > be parallelized without being massively work inefficient. For a lot > of the algorithms in the GNU parallel algorithm library, the only > parallel algorithms I was able to find in the literature are so work > inefficient that I can't imagine them ever being faster than the > serial algorithm in practice. > > In other words, if std.path is ready let's do it now instead of > waiting until parallel_algorithm is also ready. > > --David Simcha > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Steve Schveighoffer > <[email protected]> wrote: > Congrats, Dr. Kyllingstad! > > > > I think jdrewson's curl wrapper was getting going on being > reviewed, but I haven't seen an official announcement. > Jonathan? > > > -Steve > > > > ______________________________________________________ > From: Lars Tandle Kyllingstad <[email protected]> > To: Phobos mailing list <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 4:19 PM > Subject: [phobos] Anything being reviewed right now? > > > Hi, folks! > > I haven't been very active in the community as of > late, but that will > hopefully change now, because I have finally completed > my PhD. (Yay, > I'm a Dr. now!). I have some weeks of sorely-needed > vacation in front > of me and I intend to use some of that time for D > development. > > Among other things, my proposal for a new std.path is > ready for review, > and I'd like to get that underway. Rather than wade > through the > hundreds of new messages that have been posted to the > NG the past few > weeks, I thought I'd ask here instead: > > Is anything being reviewed right now, or is anything > about to be? If > not, may I put std.path up for review? > > -Lars > > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos > > > > > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos > > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
