We just had two weeks of (almost) nothing except regressions getting pulled - you really want to do that again? If an emergency release is needed, it _should_ be done on another branch - there is no reason development needs to stop.
I don't see why the import problems deserve special attention / a special release. They've been broken for a long time and like everything else they should be merged when ready. On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Brad Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/14/2012 9:00 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: >> On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 20:54:43 Brad Roberts wrote: >>> Please do NOT start pulling changes into either druntime or phobos yet. >>> This last release was massive and there's a very real chance that we'll >>> need to do a fairly quick turn around release with regression fixes. Yes, >>> it could be done on a branch, but ... >>> >>> Even if there isn't a flurry of new regressions to fix, I believe it worth a >>> slide on other priorities to take the import and related visibility changes >>> through to completion and in relative isolation. Hopefully something like >>> a 1-2 week release cycle instead of 2 months. >>> >>> Objections? >> >> I don't know. If we were going to be that quick about putting out another >> release just to fix the import issues, why didn't we just delay the 2.058 >> release then? >> >> - Jonathan M Davis > > Not particularly relevant since it is released. Do you have an objection to > the proposal that isn't based on altering > the past? :) > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
