joe wrote:
> Matt Wilson wrote:
>
> >No, htree isn't stable in 2.5, so the backport isn't either... We're
> >not going to ship something that we know could destroy data.
>
> htree looks to have stablized within the last
> few days - there are some very encouraging
> developments chronicled on lkml -
>
> Maybe time to re-evaluate?
But the point is that there isn't time to re-evaluate. Even if htree is
now completely stable, it would take at least a 4th beta to test it
properly, and probably a delay of about a month on the final release. I
can't see RedHat wanting to do that. I am afraid you will have to wait for
the 8.2 betas for htree to reappear.
Michael Young
--
Phoebe-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
