Getting back to discussion of the actual changes to the overall approach to the distro...
I can see why a group of people on a mailing list for a bleeding edge beta product would be in so much furor over the new slow 12-18 month release model on the new enterprise product line. On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 12:08, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 11:54:17AM -0800, Joseph Phillips wrote: > > This debate is insignificant. Whether called 8.1 or 9, the code is > > still the same. So from a logical point of view, this debate is > > meaningless. > > Unless you listen to what Matt Wilson had to say: the change from x.y > numbering to just x *is* actually indicative of a major change in the > overall approach to the distro. That's significant. > > -- > Matthew Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://www.mattdm.org/> > Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> > > -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
