On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 15:36, Michael Wardle wrote: > Hi > > A user on this list recently mentioned that he liked pico as a text > editor, and was disappointed that pine had been removed from the Shrike > distribution. > > I understand Red Hat's reasons for removing pine, however I am a little > surprised to not see packages for the GNU pico clone "nano" in Phoebe 3, > and suspect it is therefore not included in Shrike. I find this odd, > because I'm pretty sure it was included in previous releases, including > Valhalla. > > A number of newbie users seem to prefer nano over vi or emacs, so I'd > like Red Hat to consider once again including nano in its distribution > package set, particularly now that pine and pico are gone. > > Thanks for your consideration >
https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=105 nano will soon be in Fedora RH8 and RH9 repositories after it goes through our QA. Warren -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
