On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Tom Diehl wrote: >Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 21:29:19 -0500 (EST) >From: Tom Diehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII >List-Id: <phoebe-list.redhat.com> >Subject: Re: nano editor in Shrike? > >On 31 Mar 2003, Michael Wardle wrote: > >> On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 12:01, Jesse Keating wrote: >> > Um, I thought pine was depreciated, not fully removed yet. Am I wrong? >> >> Yes, you're right, it's *deprecated*. ;-) >> >> Someone recently made a post sounding quite annoyed at its removal, so I >> assumed it must have been removed, but a little research confirms it's >> merely deprecated. >> >> Anyway, it would still be nice for there to be a lightweight >> command-line editor that is easy to learn. Nano has been included in >> the past, and I hope Red Hat will again include it in future. > >Does it not have the same licansing problem pine has?? I love pine and hate >to see it depreciated (which means it will eventaully go) but I can see >why they are doing that. It has to be a pita to maintain. > >Maybe it is time to look for a replacment.
"deprecated", not "depreciated". 2 words spelled similarly, and of which have similar but different meaning. Don't mean to nitpick, but this is one of those "word pet peeves". ;o) -- Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
