In a message dated 12/5/2004 1:40:44 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:

I have  found that Edison DD's play well with a modern stereo using the 78 
speed, they  do not sound the same as on a DD phono, but play remarkably well 
and are not  damaged. 


 
It is interesting that you should mention this Steve, because I have been  
researching possible methods of playing Diamond Disks electrically. I love my  
machines, but I am also an audiophile, (idiofool?) and the standard Diamond  
Disk tracking force of approximately 150 grams makes me cringe. The Shure  
V-15MR in my modern, Rega turntable tracks at one (1) gram. Edison proudly  
claimed 
that Diamond Disks would "last for 1,000 plays." This is probably  true, and 
was an incredible feat for that time, but as my disks approach their  
centennials, it doesn't sound so incredible. I want someone else to enjoy my  
records 
when I am deaf and/or dead. 
 
Diamond Disk playback on modern gear presents special challenges. First,  
they are not 78's, (no asides about the very last electrics, please). They need 
 
to be played back at 80 RPM. Several companies market modified turntables that 
 will run at speeds to accommodate early Berliners, acoustic Victors, 
Orthophonic  Victors, Columbias, Pathes, Edisons, and other disks, as well as 
those 
huge  transcription records used to record radio shows back in the day.  Some 
units will spin records at speeds from 16 RPM, to as  high as 90 RPM. 
 
Diamond disks present another unique problem when one tries to  play them on 
modified, modern turntables. A shellac 78 is not much, if any  thicker than an 
LP, especially 180 gram, audiophile pressings. Diamond Disks are  a LOT 
thicker, enough to present VTA (Vertical Tracking Angle) problems. A tone  arm 
should always be parallel to a record it is trying to track. To accomplish  
this 
now, a turntable requires a tone arm with adjustable height. This narrows  the 
choices further, and ups the price. Most modern turntables that have  been set 
up to play 78's are fairly modest in cost, compared to what  well-heeled, LP 
collectors often pay for their rigs. It is possible to spend  $10,000 for a 
modern, "high-end" turntable, and $4,000 for a cartridge  to play LP's. Few 78 
collectors are interested in that kind of gear. However, a  few of the modified 
units are available with this feature. 
 
Several companies make cartridges that will play 78's. Most high-quality  
cartridges designed for LP playback are too fragile to take the beatings 78's  
dish out, but Shure, Stanton, and Grado all offer cartridges designed to play  
78's, and supply  2.7 mil styli to play postwar, shellac 78's. Edison  Diamond 
Disks need a different diameter stylus. Expert Stylus, in England, makes  
styli for several modern cartridges that are the recommended 3.5 mil  diameter. 
In 
fact, they make sets of styli with 5 different diameters, so  one can find 
which stylus works best with any given record.
 
Now, we have a stylus that is the right size, in a rugged cartridge,  mounted 
in a tone arm that is the correct height, on a turntable that is  spinning at 
the proper speed. Life is good, right? Not just yet. Most  78's are 
lateral-cut records. Diamond disks are vertical-cut records. One  channel is 
going to 
be mostly noise, if we try to play these records on a  stereo. Some turntables 
offer a Vertical/Lateral switch as options to resolve  this problem. If a 
turntable does not, then one must use a Y  adaptor on the correct channel, and 
feed the leads to the correct  input jacks. The lead from the unwanted channel 
can be plugged (grounded)  into an unused jack. If it is left dangling, hum 
will 
likely result.
 
There is one last problem to be resolved, and it is perhaps the least  
understood of all. Most of us have seen older electric phonographs with 
settings  
that say, "RIAA", "LP", or "78." These are equalization curves. The ideas 
behind 
 them are too involved to discuss here, but let it suffice to say that 
collectors  of pre-WWII records do not want any of these settings. We need what 
is 
called a  "flat" setting, a setting that adds no boost to one frequency  range 
over another. It is almost impossible to find a preamp that is powerful  
enough to boost the signal from a phono cartridge enough to drive a line-level  
input on a stereo, or computer, without running into unneeded and  unwanted 
RIAA 
equalization. The few units around that attempt  to circumvent this problem 
use complicated, convoluted circuitry in  attempts to fool phono inputs into 
thinking they are performing their tasks  correctly. I have found one preamp 
that 
amplifies phono cartridge outputs enough  to drive line-level inputs, without 
using any equalization. It is intended for  people who are burning their 
cherished LP's onto CD's. The equalization issues  are dealt with by whatever 
software the users employ to prepare their LP's  for transfer to LP.
 
Even this does not solve all problems. The equalization our records and  
machines used was mechanical. Edisons could not even be played properly on 
other  
makers' machines. Victor records were designed to sound best on Victor  
machines. Columbias were supposed to sound best on Columbia machines, etc.  The 
records and machines were designed to compliment each other. One can use a  
graphic equalizer, which is really a sophisticated tone control, in a tape 
loop,  
and tweak the sound to your taste.
 
Playback of our beloved disks using modern gear is possible, and the  results 
can be very good. You just have to do your homework. Don't let the sound  of 
most CDs made from old recordings deter you. The engineers who process those  
recordings mean well, but they don't know, in most cases, what the records 
they  are working on sound like when they are played back on properly  
functioning, original equipment. We do know what they should sound like, and we 
 can do 
at least as good a job as those folks have. Modern playback  systems are 
certainly easier on our records, and they will help us  preserve our beloved 
disks 
for future generations to enjoy.
 
Randy Minor
 

Reply via email to