Brunswick. The motors are silent and dependable, and the two I have owned had very good Ultona heads that played Diamond Discs better than the Edison machine. The fidelity of the acoustically recorded discs was great too. Of course, they have a large diaphragm. But for the money, I have never beaten a good Brunswick. John Robles
Richard Rubin <[email protected]> wrote: Here's a question I've wanted to ask everyone here for a while, now: Working off the assumption that Victors are the best-sounding phonographs (which seems to be a general concensus -- please feel free to disagree, though), who would you say made the second-best-sounding machines? Since we need to compare likes to likes, let's limit the field to inside-horn, pre-orthophonic disc phonographs. What do you think? _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list [email protected] Phono-L Archive http://phono-l.oldcrank.org/archive/ Support Phono-L http://www.cafepress.com/oldcrank
