Ditto! I don't think shellac can touch the sound of a 51000 and up record.
Bill -------------- Original message -------------- From: Peter Fraser <[email protected]> > i prefer late edison DDs to orthophonics, myself! > > On Apr 10, 2006, at 6:42 PM, Richard Rubin wrote: > > > Here's a question I've wanted to ask everyone here for a while, now: > > Working off the assumption that Victors are the best-sounding > > phonographs > > (which seems to be a general concensus -- please feel free to > > disagree, > > though), who would you say made the second-best-sounding machines? > > Since we > > need to compare likes to likes, let's limit the field to inside-horn, > > pre-orthophonic disc phonographs. What do you think? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Phono-L mailing list > > [email protected] > > > > Phono-L Archive > > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org/archive/ > > > > Support Phono-L > > http://www.cafepress.com/oldcrank > > -- Peter > [email protected] > > > > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > [email protected] > > Phono-L Archive > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org/archive/ > > Support Phono-L > http://www.cafepress.com/oldcrank From [email protected] Tue Apr 11 08:19:56 2006 From: [email protected] ([email protected]) Date: Sun Dec 24 13:11:31 2006 Subject: [Phono-L] Best-sounding phonographs? Message-ID: <[email protected]> I agree. DDs stand by themselves. My other "fav." is a Davenola with internal wooden horn. Great sound, large soundbox, three spring. Made by Davenport Cabinet Works, IA.
