Hi Walt Thanks for the great info! Actually, I think it was the interlocking castings, because I got the remaining part of the tonearm out of the elbow (see pics). I think a new elbow is required too because it looks like the internal casting is damaged. The tonearm was broken off at the elbow, but the part remaining inside did turn still. John
Walt <[email protected]> wrote: John, Does the tone arm swivel freely (i.e. raise and lower) easily? Assuming that it does move freely and you are POSITIVE that it is the type with the wire retainer ring, first oil the joint as best you can. Let the oil run into the joint for a few minutes. I have a jig for holding the base, but you can wrap it with a thick towel or piece of thick rubber pad better yet and then secure it in a vice with just enough tension to hold it in place so it doesn't move. Don't over tighten the vice or you will crush the pot metal. Once securely held, swing the tone arm out and tap it away form the elbow (as to separate the parts) very gingerly with a small urethane or wood hammer as close to the elbow as possible. Every now and then I can simply oil them and they have enough play to wiggle loose by hand simply pulling outwardly and rocking the parts very lightly as you pull. But most of the time (like yesterday and last week) there isn't enough play to easily separate them, so I use the technique described above. If the elbow and tone arm are seized or exceedingly stubborn, be extremely careful and use as much penetrating oil as you can. Tap very lightly and take your time. I have never had one that could not be removed, but they do sometimes take a while to get apart. If you aren't sure if the parts have the inside retaining ring or the interlocking castings, the same technique will work, but with the latter configuration you want to make certain that you have the tone arm in the "raised" position (which allows the molded tab on the arm to align with the open slot on the elbow) should you need to tap it lightly. Otherwise, it will look like most of the elbows you see on eBay . Walt -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of john robles Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 8:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Phono-L] Columbia tonearm needed Hi All I am in need of a grafonola tonearm as shown in the attached photo. Can anyone help me with this? It is for a young lady who needs her Grafonola fized. And if someone can tell me how to release the arm from the elbow I would appreciate it..can;t seem to get it. I think it has a retainer ring, but can't figure how to release it. Thanks John Robles -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.412 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/699 - Release Date: 2/23/2007 _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 2007_02250003.jpg Type: image/pjpeg Size: 27622 bytes Desc: 490934885-2007_02250003.jpg Url : http://www.oldcrank.org/pipermail/phono-l/attachments/20070225/ce2ef31e/2007_02250003-0001.bin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 2007_02250004.jpg Type: image/pjpeg Size: 28295 bytes Desc: 3987884849-2007_02250004.jpg Url : http://www.oldcrank.org/pipermail/phono-l/attachments/20070225/ce2ef31e/2007_02250004-0001.bin From [email protected] Sun Feb 25 09:40:05 2007 From: [email protected] (Loran T. Hughes) Date: Sun Feb 25 09:40:16 2007 Subject: [Phono-L] Phono-L Info Repository In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> References: <009a01c758f0$bbda26e0$6500a...@your4dacd0ea75> <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Let's just say that my computer budget normally outpaces my phonograph budget. Sad, but true (as I adjust my black framed glasses held together with old bandaids). Loran On Feb 25, 2007, at 7:50 AM, Peter Fraser wrote: > oh, he does. he can be mighty geekity when necessary. > > (and that's a compliment) > > On Feb 25, 2007, at 7:22 AM, Robert Vuillemenot wrote: > >> I have no idea what this means and I'm sure most of the list doesn't >> either. We're phono collectors not computer geeks. I hope Loran >> understands what you wrote. >> RMV
