I still would like to complete my collection of Vogues, if anybody has Queen 
For A Day, that you are willing to sell, contact me off-line.  Thanks Al 
Menashe
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[email protected]>
To: <phono-l at oldcrank.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Vogue Picture Records values


> hi all
> i have many early victor picture records and they seem to hold up a bit
> better than the vogues
> but they are all fun to collect
> disney even had some sung by frank luther  such as dance of the  boogey 
> man
> and the winnie the pooh group in the early thirties
>
>
>
> In a message dated 8/14/2008 4:44:39 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> cdh041 at earthlink.net writes:
>
> Or,  possibly that Saffady felt that the aluminum substrate, allied with 
> the
> flexible plastic would make a virtually indestructable sandwich.  Plastics
> were not as well understood in 1946 as they are now. And too, as I  have 
> to
> remind everyone I chat with, records, radios, cars, phonographs  were not
> expected to be in service, or indeed, even existence 50 years  after they
> were made. We have no right to demand eternal survival of  anything more
> than perhaps, Gibraltar or the Rockies......and per Ira  Gershwin, they're
> only made of clay!
>
>
>> [Original  Message]
>> From: Greg Bogantz <gbogantz1 at charter.net>
>> To:  Antique Phonograph List <phono-l at oldcrank.org>
>> Date: 8/14/2008  4:26:03 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Vogue Picture Records  values
>>
>>     Yes, the vinyl records from the  postwar period have held up
> surprisingly
>> well so far.   Certainly better than magnetic tape from that period.  If
> you
>>  can manage to find a Vogue that hasn't been played or scratched to 
>> death,
>> the sound quality on them is pretty good.  But one of their  potential
>> problems is the oxidation of the aluminum  substrate.   I have more than
> one
>> Vogue that has been  severely cracked or chipped in years past which has
>> allowed moisture  and air to get to the aluminum surface.  This causes
> mild
>> to  severe powderizing and bubbling of oxide to form on the aluminum 
>> which
>> then bubbles up the paper and vinyl sheet laid on top of it.   This 
>> damage
>> can usually be heard before it's seen - the bubbling  causes a noticeable
>> increase in the rumble content when you play the  record.  I'm not sure
> why
>> Vogues were made with an aluminum  substrate rather than using a vinyl
> core
>> as is done with modern  picture records.  Might have been a patent
>> infringement thing  since RCA and others had made picture records in the
>>  1930s.
>>
>> Greg Bogantz
>>
>>
>>
>> -----  Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Douglas Houston"  <cdh041 at earthlink.net>
>> To: "Antique Phonograph List"  <phono-l at oldcrank.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 2:45  PM
>> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Vogue Picture Records  values
>>
>>
>> > Indeed. There have been very few plastics  that  have had any 
>> > permanence.
>> > Catalin has shown to be more  stable than many others, but when the
>> > plasticizer finally dries  out of the plasticx, it's curtains for the
>> > piece.
>> >  In the thirties, plastics were all the panic. There were things shown 
>> > in
>> > plastics that were downright sensational. I'm sure that a lot  of 
>> > people
>> > thought that glass would soon be made obsolete by  gorgeous plastic
> things.
>> > Well, my mother and my aunt didn't  throw out their cut crystal, and I
> now
>> > have a couple of  cabinets full of it.
>> >
>> > In those days (that I remember  so well), the automotive industry went
>> > ballistic over plastics  too. Today, there are guys who re-mold 
>> > steering
>> > wheels for those  cars. The big plstic was Tenite I, a plastic by
> Tennessee
>> >  Eastman in Kingsport, Tennessee. You'll travel long and far to see an
>>  > original steering wheel on a prewar car!.  However, I have a  '38
> Cadillac,
>> > with the original steering wheel, and still  decent dash plastic, and 
>> > you
>> > just don't ever see that.
>>  >
>> > Which brings us to the Vogue records. Tom Saffady, a  tool  and die
> maker
>> > on
>> > East eight mile road  in East Detroit (Across 8 Mile from Detroit) got
> the
>> > idea of  making these pretty records. I understand that he used an
> aluminum
>>  > base, attached the artwork to it, and molded the plastic to it, 
>> pressing
>> > the recording in the same operation. While I don't know  for sure what
> the
>> > plastic is, I'm sure that  it's a  vinyl, and of the best quality at 
>> > the
>> > time. When they hit the  stores, they made quite a splash, and they 
>> > sold
>> > well, more for  their novel character than anything else. No surprise,
> they
>> >  were priced higher than the major brand shellac discs, but their charm
>> > gave
>> > them their value. Sadly, the novelty wore off,  and Saffady wasn't able
> to
>> > get the price down to meet the  competition. He had tried to have a
>> > multiple
>> >  pressing rig, to perss (I believe) nine discs at once, but it never
>>  > worked.
>> > He folded, unfortunately, and his building later  housed a cutthroat
>> > department store caled something like Hall of  bargains. One day, I
> passed
>> > there, and the place had been  gutted by fire, and not all of the walls
>> > were
>> >  standing. I believe that there is a fast food place on that site 
>> > today.
>> >
>> > So, what about the plastic that Sav-Way  Industries (Tom Saffady) used 
>> > on
>> > those discs? Astoundingly, it  seems to have held up very well. Since
> Vinyl
>> > plastics harden  and shrink with age, I would worry about the Vogue 
>> > discs
>> >  deteriorating at some time in the future. Plastics are not  permanent,
> and
>> > the newest Vogue disc is about 62 byears  old.  The aluminum core will
> not
>> > shrink, but the plastic  could.
>> >
>> >
>> >> [Original Message]
>>  >> From: Greg Bogantz <gbogantz1 at charter.net>
>> >> To:  Antique Phonograph List <phono-l at oldcrank.org>
>> >> Date:  8/13/2008 5:02:57 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Vogue Picture  Records values
>> >>
>> >>     Doug, it's  especially ironic that you use the phrase "the base in
> the
>> >>  catalin game is crumbling".  Not just the base, but the cabinets
>>  > themselves.
>> >> Catalin degenerates steadily and eventually  falls apart with age.
>> > Shoving a
>> >> bunch of money  at catalin is like stacking time bombs on your shelf.
> Not
>> >>  unlike investing in Edison 4-minute wax amberols.  Sit them on  your
> shelf
>> >> and listen for the steady "clink, tink, clunk"  of the records
>> >> self-destructing as the temperature and  humidity changes in your 
>> >> house.
>> >> "Investors" who sink a lot of  money in these absurdities deserve what
>> >> they're going to get  - a pile of dust before it's all over.
>> >>
>> >> Greg  Bogantz
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  ----- Original Message ----- 
>> >> From: "Douglas Houston"  <cdh041 at earthlink.net>
>> >> To: "Antique Phonograph List"  <phono-l at oldcrank.org>
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008  4:43 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Vogue Picture Records  values
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Reading all  these comments looks like the replay of a lot of
>> >> >  collector's
>> >> > panics over the years. I saw it with coins,  back in the sixties,
> with a
>> >> > friend who was into them,  and I probably know of other similar
>> > situations
>> >>  > as well. The price level spirals up to the point that the only
>>  >> > exchanges
>> >> > are from dealer to dealer.  Dealers begin to get tired of getting 
>> >> > the
>> > same
>> >>  > item over and over, and somewhere, somebody stops buying. It   is
> then,
>> >> > that
>> >> > the tower  tumbles, and a lot of nspeculators lose a bundle on
>> >  now-lowered
>> >> > value stuff.
>> >> >
>>  >> > One thing that comes to mind right now, is the hunger for radios 
>> with
>> >> > catalin cabinets. They've gone thousands of bucks  for some models. 
>> >> > As
>> > far
>> >> > as radios go, the  chassis in them are 99.9999% cheap, and dinky. 
>> >> > It's
>> > the
>>  >> > pretty plastic cases that are the real issue. It isn't  radio
> collectors
>> >> > that want them. It's those who want  the pret-ty colorful cabinets,
> and
>> > of
>> >> >  course, the capital gains that result from the exchange of them.
>>  >> >
>> >> > On the surface, at least, there has never  been any short supply of
>> >> > them.
>> >> >  There are dealers in the big rado meets, who have 20 or 30 of them 
>> >> > on
>>  >> > their
>> >> > table. It's amusing that lots of  sellers on the 'bay call a 
>> >> > bakelite
>> > radio
>> >> >  cabinet Catalin. I'm sure that many a buyer has been badly 
>> >> > jostled
> by
>> > one
>> >> > of those shysters, but  the buyer should research, and know what he 
>> >> > /
>> > she
>>  >> > is
>> >> > buying. Anyway, it's  now  beginning th look like the base in the
>> >> > catalin
>>  >> > game is crumbling. There are signs that prices are possibly on  the
> way
>> >> > down, and I'd be delighted to see it happen.  The cabinets are 
>> >> > pretty;
>> > the
>> >> > radios are  garbage.
>> >> >
>> >> > One of the things that  killed Vogue records in the first place was
> that
>> >> > they  never had a hit. I also recall that they were priced at $1.05,
>> >  while
>> >> > the major labels sold for $.75 I bought a couple  of them, new back
>> >> > then,
>> >> > not for  what was on them, but because they were pretty.  Someone 
>> >> > has
>>  >> > already said that Vogue discs are desirable, not so much for  their
>> >> > programmatic content, but their cuteness. Today,  wise people are
>> > pulling
>> >> > in
>> >>  > their horns, and hanging on to their mazuma. We are already in an
>>  > economic
>> >> > slump, and it promises to get slumpier. I  can imagine other 
>> >> > scenarios
>> > like
>> >> > this in  the days ahead.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>  >> [Original Message]
>> >> >> From: Mike Stitt  <smstitt at gmail.com>
>> >> >> To: Antique Phonograph  List <phono-l at oldcrank.org>
>> >> >> Date: 8/13/2008  2:13:30 PM
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Vogue Picture  Records values
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Vogues went  high after Ed Curry's book. Before the book they were
>> >>  >> cheap. I even found them at Goodwill.
>> >> >> The  market is very soft across the board. High prices bring more 
>> >> >> to
>>  >> >> market. eBay helped to do that. Collectors get all they  need. I
>> >> >> suggest Vogues in the market exceeded  interested or new collectors
>> >> >> entering into that  market. Most casual collectors are content to
> have
>> >>  >> a few as they define a genre. Few want a complete number run
>>  >> >> (production run) at a $100 a pop. IMHO. The Queen for a Day  a few
>> >> >> years back went for "stupid money."
>>  >> >>  I have many Vogues and have little interest in them at  those
> prices.
>> >> >> Mike
>> >>  >>
>> >> >> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Albert  <cenfin at comcast.net> 
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > for sure, I  got bit by the bug and bought up as many as I could
>> >  trying
>> >> > to
>> >> >> > complete the  collection and I almost did, but have probably lost
>> > about
>>  >> > half
>> >> >> > of my investment.  I am  missing the Transformer and Queen for a
> Day.
>> > I
>>  >> > have
>> >> >> > to assume those are still  worth a lot.  Al
>> >> >> > ----- Original Message  -----
>> >> >> > From:  <wilenzick at bellsouth.net>
>> >> >> > To: "Antique  Phonograph List" <phono-l at oldcrank.org>
>> >> >> >  Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 10:20 AM
>> >> >> >  Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Vogue Picture Records values
>> >> >>  >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Thanks  for your interesting comment on the Vogues.  I agree 
>> >> >> >> with
>> >  you
>> >> >> >> on
>> >> >> >>  the
>> >> >> >> reason for the drop in value of the  Wurlitzer 1015, but I am 
>> >> >> >> not
> so
>> >> > sure
>> >>  >> >> the
>> >> >> >> same argument applies  to the Vogues.  The 1015's were bought 
>> >> >> >> and
>> > sold
>>  >> > as
>> >> >> >> entertainment devices, and  the bars, etc. that bought them for
> 45s
>> > and
>> >>  > CDs
>> >> >> >> could care less if they were  original or reproduction machines.
> On
>> >> >> >>  the
>> >> >> >> other hand, vogues were generally not  bought for their music
>> > content,
>> >> > but
>>  >> >> >> rather as vintage collectibles.  Prior to  eBay, collectors
>> > considered
>> >> > them
>>  >> >> >> to be "scarce" items, and most record collectors, I  would 
>> think,
>> > would
>> >> >> >>  have
>> >> >> >> little interest in the  reproductions.  Once eBay demonstrated 
>> >> >> >> to
>> >> >>  >> the
>> >> > hobby
>> >> >> >>  that they were rather plentiful, the prices started to drop to
> the
>>  >> > current
>> >> >> >> low values.  I  don't know how well the reproduction Vogues are
>> >> >>  >> doing
>> >> > these
>> >> >> >>  days, but I don't see them advertised very much (although I 
>> >> >> >> don't
>> >  look
>> >> > for
>> >> >> >> them).   Whatever the reason for the price decline, Vogues don't
>> >>  >> >> look
>> >> > like
>> >> >>  >> good investments these days :)
>> >> >>  >>
>> >> >> >> Ray
>> >> >>  >>
>> >> >> >> ----- Original Message  -----
>> >> >> >> From: "Albert"  <cenfin at comcast.net>
>> >> >> >> To: "Antique  Phonograph List" <phono-l at oldcrank.org>
>> >> >>  >> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 12:01 PM
>> >> >>  >> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Vogue Picture Records values
>> >>  >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>  >>> Ray, I think Ebay actually raised the value of vogues and 
>> >> >> there
>> > was a
>> >> > lot
>> >> >>  >>> of
>> >> >> >>> activity for a long  time on ebay. Many hit the market and it 
>> >> >> >>> was
>> > not
>> >>  >> >>> unusual
>> >> >> >>> to see  them go for more than $100.   But the prices started
>> >  dropping
>> >> >> >>> quickly
>> >>  >> >>> when a lot of reproduction Vogues hit the market.   The repros
>> > looked
>> >> >> >>>  pretty
>> >> >> >>> good and they were copies of  some of the more desireable
> numbers.
>> > I
>> >>  >> >>> compare
>> >> >> >>> that to  the Wurlitzer 1015 where originals used to sell for
>> >  $12,000.
>> >> >> >>> With
>> >> >>  >>> the huge number of reproduction 1015s that played 45's and 
>> >> >> CD;s
>> >> >> >>> the
>> >> >  value
>> >> >> >>> of
>> >> >>  >>> originals dropped to $5000 to 6000.  I may be wrong but I 
>> >> >> dont
>> > think
>> >> > it
>> >> >>  >>> was
>> >> >> >>> Ebay so much as the  proliferation of reproductions.  Al 
>> >> >> >>> Menashe
>> >> >>  >>> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> >>  >>> From: <wilenzick at bellsouth.net>
>> >> >>  >>> To: <phonolist at yahoogroups.com>;  <Phono-L at oldcrank.org>
>> >> >> >>> Sent:  Tuesday, August 12, 2008 4:55 PM
>> >> >> >>>  Subject: [Phono-L] Vogue Picture Records values
>> >> >>  >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>  >>>> Around 10 to 15 years ago, most Vogues (except the rare 8 or 
>> >> >> 9
>> > ones)
>> >> >> >>>> sold
>>  >> >> >>>> in the neighborhood of $100 or so.   With the advent of eBay,
>> >> >> >>>>  their
>> >> > value
>> >> >> >>>>  has dropped significantly.  It seems that most go for 
>> >> >> >>>> $20-$30
> or
>> >> >> >>>> less
>> >>  >> >>>> these days.  Value guides were available at one  time, but 
>> >> now
> are
>> >> >> >>>>  worthless.  Are there any Vogue collectors on the list  that
> would
>> >> > have a
>> >> >>  >>>> spreadsheet or other information on current values of  these
>> > picture
>> >> >> >>>>  records?  Is there a factor, such as 1/4 or 1/3 that could be
>>  >> > applied to
>> >> >> >>>> the old  values that would approximate the current value?
> Thanks
>> >  for
>> >> > any
>> >> >> >>>>  information..
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >>  >> >>>> Ray Wilenzick
>> >> >>  >>>> _______________________________________________
>>  >> >> >>>> Phono-L mailing list
>> >>  >> >>>> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
>> >>  >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>>  >> >> >>>> --
>> >> >>  >>>> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
>> >>  >> >>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> >>  >> >>>> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.19/955 -  Release
> Date:
>> >> >> >>>> 8/15/2007
>>  >> >> >>>> 4:55 PM
>> >> >>  >>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >>  >> >>> _______________________________________________
>>  >> >> >>> Phono-L mailing list
>> >> >>  >>> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
>> >> >>  >>>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>  >>
>> >> >> >>  _______________________________________________
>> >> >>  >> Phono-L mailing list
>> >> >> >>  http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
>> >> >> >
>> >>  >> > _______________________________________________
>> >>  >> > Phono-L mailing list
>> >> >> >  http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
>> >> >> >
>> >>  >> _______________________________________________
>> >>  >> Phono-L mailing list
>> >> >>  http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
>> >> >
>> >>  >
>> >> >
>> >> >  _______________________________________________
>> >> > Phono-L  mailing list
>> >> > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
>>  >>
>> >>  _______________________________________________
>> >> Phono-L  mailing list
>> >> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
>> >
>>  >
>> >
>> >  _______________________________________________
>> > Phono-L mailing  list
>> > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> Phono-L mailing  list
>>  http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Phono-L  mailing  list
> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
>
>
>
>
>
> **************Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your 
> budget?
> Read reviews on AOL Autos.
> (http://autos.aol.com/cars-Volkswagen-Jetta-2009/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00030000000007
>  
>  )
> _______________________________________________
> Phono-L mailing list
> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org 

Reply via email to