hi ray et al on mine i cant tell you i still need to find an appropriate stylus mine did not come with one In a message dated 9/5/2008 11:19:17 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, wilenzick at bellsouth.net writes:
I have an AO, but not an AW. I have been told that the sound quality of the AW reproducer is inferior to that of the AO, so why would anyone want to convert the machines. Is that true? Ray ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <phono-l at oldcrank.org> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 10:30 AM Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Columbia no. 5 reproducer repair for Columbia AO > HI > I have an ao and an aow > the reproducer and the neck it sits on are totally different on these > so be careful in trying to convert one > > > In a message dated 9/3/2008 4:37:11 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > valecnik57-purc at yahoo.com writes: > > I'm looking for recommendations regarding someone who could expertly > repair > the reproducer on my Columbia AO. It's the floating type, a no. 5, I > believe > although it is not marked in any way. Would also be interested in the > conversion kit to install the model 8 reproducer, which essentially > converts an > AO to an AW. > > Thanks, > Bruce > > > > > > - > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org > > > > > > **************It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your > travel > deal here. > (http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047) > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org > _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org **************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com. (http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014)
