hi i am rob mallett in sarasota florida the reproducer is original but not for that machine the gutta percha is what belongs on that email me and i can take some pictures of it its a good machine i was trying to sell it at the florida show but not much was selling due to the economy zono In a message dated 2/12/2009 7:53:10 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes:
The "Indiana Graphophone" nameplate in my pictures below is gone? I wonder what happened to it? Do you have any pics of the machine with the new nickel plating? I always intended to do that (and a new decal), and I think Shawn was planning the same. What were you saying about a gutta percha reproducer? I could never figure out if the metal one in my pictures was an original or a repro. By the way, remind me who "zono" is. I usually don't remember who the alias guys are. Jim Nichol [email protected] On Feb 12, 2009, at 5:09 PM, [email protected] wrote: > hi again > shawn or someone did take the id plate off but its all the same still > i wish i has the id plate too > best to all > zono > > > In a message dated 2/11/2009 7:56:04 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, > [email protected] writes: > > I sold my Columbia N in 2006 to Shawn O'Rourke (who's probably on > Phono-L). There are still pictures of the N at: > > http://web.mac.com/jn45224/iWeb/Site/Library.html > > I don't know enough about Columbias to know what kind of reproducer > is > shown in the photos. But I believe it worked OK. > > Jim Nichol > > On Feb 11, 2009, at 5:35 PM, Raymond Wilenzick wrote: > >> Happy Tom Edison's Birthday to all. >> >> I have a Columbia Type N Graphophone in very nice mechanical >> condition, but have a problem. When the #2 reproducer is lowered to >> playing position, the stylus does not quite contact the cylinder >> surface on any cylinder I have tried. The reproducer support tube >> is moving properly. Has anyone else seen this with a Type N, and if >> so what is the solution? I know the N was originally supplied with >> the #1 gutta percha reproducer ( which I don't have!), and wonder if >> it was thicker than a #2. >> Any suggestions would be appreciated. >> >> Ray >> _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1218822736x1201267884/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=62%26bcd=fe bemailfooterNO62) From [email protected] Sat Feb 14 10:14:49 2009 From: [email protected] (john robles) Date: Sat Feb 14 10:14:55 2009 Subject: [Phono-L] Back Bracket/Tonearm to trade Message-ID: <[email protected]> Happy Valentine's day to all! Has anybody got a Victor III Back bracket and tonearm that they would trade for a Victor II back bracket and tonearm?? There is not much striping on the Vic II tonearm, and I wouldn't be too picky about the Victor III bracket..I have a really nice Victor III that I am going to have to sell, but the back bracket is incorrect and I would like to fix that. It does have a very nice elbow as well, and I might be enticed to throw that in for a straight trade. I know I'd be getting the worst of that deal, but I do need to sell the three. Spouse out of work for 8 months now and nothing in sight. Thanks! John Robles From [email protected] Sat Feb 14 10:17:04 2009 From: [email protected] (john robles) Date: Sat Feb 14 10:17:33 2009 Subject: [Phono-L] HMV Model 104, VV-XVI for sale Message-ID: <[email protected]> Hi I also have a very nice HMV model 104, which is similar to a Victrola VIII but has the HMV orthophonic reproducer, and this little machine sounds absolutley amazing! $300, email for pics. Late Victrola XVI, mahogany, goldplated hardware, excellent sound, original key, $675. Email for pics. Thanks John Robles From [email protected] Sat Feb 14 11:02:46 2009 From: [email protected] (Abe Feder) Date: Sat Feb 14 11:02:53 2009 Subject: [Phono-L] HMV Model 104, VV-XVI for sale In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> John, Would like to see pics for the 104 thx Abe Feder need4art On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:17 AM, john robles <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > I also have a very nice HMV model 104, which is similar to a Victrola VIII > but has the HMV orthophonic reproducer, and this little machine sounds > absolutley amazing! $300, email for pics. > Late Victrola XVI, mahogany, goldplated hardware, excellent sound, original > key, $675. Email for pics. > Thanks > John Robles > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org > From [email protected] Sat Feb 14 11:05:03 2009 From: [email protected] (john robles) Date: Sat Feb 14 11:05:07 2009 Subject: [Phono-L] Rare Victor Graphophone on ebay... Message-ID: <[email protected]> Check this out if you want to see a rare 'collaboration' between Victor and Columbia... 150325308752 From [email protected] Sat Feb 14 12:49:13 2009 From: [email protected] (William Buchanan) Date: Sat Feb 14 12:49:18 2009 Subject: [Phono-L] Help needed for missing reproducer Message-ID: <[email protected]> Hello, I am a disabled vet and I have started working and collecting phonographs (when I can find them really cheap)to help me deal with the pain from my injuries. I purchased from ebay a Victrola VV 2-35 (for about $30 after shipping). Of course at this price there was a couple of things wrong with the machine. I have one last item to fix and I am not able to locate the part and that would be the reproducer. Does anybody have a reproducer that would fit this player? It does not have to be in mint condition. If you have one please contact me. [email protected] Thank you Bill Buchanan From [email protected] Sun Feb 15 08:20:14 2009 From: [email protected] (Jim Nichol) Date: Sun Feb 15 13:46:29 2009 Subject: [Phono-L] Graphophone N Question In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> I think I finally figured out what happened to the Columbia N nameplate, after I got my brain engaged properly. Actually, I found some old emails that probably explained it. My Columbia N, although complete, looked awful (as you can see in the pictures link below). It was missing most of the decal, the nickel plating, and some of the wood veneer, etc. I didn't think I'd be able to sell it. Then I saw a message from Shawn on Phonolist looking for some Columbia N parts. So I sold it to him for a parts machine, figuring he could make one nice machine from the parts we both had. (I can't believe I forgot that part when I wrote the previous msg below). Shawn was very generous in his price offer, even giving me MORE MONEY than I asked for!!!! He was a true gentleman though the whole process. I'd deal with Shawn again any day. Jim Nichol On Feb 12, 2009, at 7:51 PM, Jim Nichol wrote: > The "Indiana Graphophone" nameplate in my pictures below is gone? I > wonder what happened to it? Do you have any pics of the machine with > the new nickel plating? I always intended to do that (and a new > decal), and I think Shawn was planning the same. What were you > saying about a gutta percha reproducer? I could never figure out if > the metal one in my pictures was an original or a repro. By the way, > remind me who "zono" is. I usually don't remember who the alias guys > are. > > Jim Nichol > [email protected] > > On Feb 12, 2009, at 5:09 PM, [email protected] wrote: > >> hi again >> shawn or someone did take the id plate off but its all the same still >> i wish i has the id plate too >> best to all >> zono >> >> >> In a message dated 2/11/2009 7:56:04 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, >> [email protected] writes: >> >> I sold my Columbia N in 2006 to Shawn O'Rourke (who's probably on >> Phono-L). There are still pictures of the N at: >> >> http://web.mac.com/jn45224/iWeb/Site/Library.html >> >> I don't know enough about Columbias to know what kind of >> reproducer is >> shown in the photos. But I believe it worked OK. >> >> Jim Nichol >> >> On Feb 11, 2009, at 5:35 PM, Raymond Wilenzick wrote: >> >>> Happy Tom Edison's Birthday to all. >>> >>> I have a Columbia Type N Graphophone in very nice mechanical >>> condition, but have a problem. When the #2 reproducer is lowered >>> to >>> playing position, the stylus does not quite contact the cylinder >>> surface on any cylinder I have tried. The reproducer support tube >>> is moving properly. Has anyone else seen this with a Type N, and >>> if >>> so what is the solution? I know the N was originally supplied with >>> the #1 gutta percha reproducer ( which I don't have!), and wonder >>> if >>> it was thicker than a #2. >>> Any suggestions would be appreciated. >>> >>> Ray >>> > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
