hi you can have steve farmer oxidize it and rebuild it at the same time he does great work zono In a message dated 3/31/2009 3:34:30 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:
Hi, Does anyone have a recorder that is oxidized, or a model "H" oxidized? My dream is to convert my model "B" Ideal to a 2 & 4 minute machine. Burdette Walters [email protected] --- On Tue, 3/31/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Phono-L Digest, Vol 6, Issue 79 To: [email protected] Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 2:00 PM Send Phono-L mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://oldcrank.org/mailman/listinfo/phono-l or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Phono-L digest..." If you reply, please change your subject line and don't include this entire digest in your message. Today's Topics: 1. re Polyphone and Bettini Attachments (Mario Frazzetto) 2. Edison Repeater ([email protected]) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:56:38 +0200 From: Mario Frazzetto <[email protected]> Subject: [Phono-L] re Polyphone and Bettini Attachments To: Phono-L <[email protected]>, Phonolist <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Hey Guys, Putting it out there. I will pay a good price to add something Bettini and/or Polyphone to my collection. Email me at: [email protected] Cheers, Mario ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:37:02 -0400 From: [email protected] Subject: [Phono-L] Edison Repeater To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I'm in need of a repeater for a "Triumph."? The upper pulley is not necessary, but I will purchase complete/on "Triumph" mechanism if necessary.? Can anyone help me?? Thanks - - George Paul [email protected] ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org End of Phono-L Digest, Vol 6, Issue 79 ************************************** _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org **************New Low Prices on Dell Laptops ? Starting at $399 (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1220631247x1201390185/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fad.doubl eclick.net%2Fclk%3B213540506%3B35046329%3Bx) From [email protected] Wed Apr 1 11:32:18 2009 From: [email protected] (gregory caringi) Date: Wed Apr 1 11:32:26 2009 Subject: [Phono-L] Re: Phono-L Digest, Vol 6, Issue 79 In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> I am also a fan of Steve Farmer. He does great work. You can contact him at: [email protected] > From: [email protected] > Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:09:08 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Re: Phono-L Digest, Vol 6, Issue 79 > To: [email protected] > > hi > you can have steve farmer oxidize it and rebuild it at the same time > he does great work > zono > > > In a message dated 3/31/2009 3:34:30 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > > Hi, > Does anyone have a recorder that is oxidized, or a model "H" oxidized? My > dream is to convert my model "B" Ideal to a 2 & 4 minute machine. > Burdette Walters > [email protected] > > --- On Tue, 3/31/09, [email protected] > <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Phono-L Digest, Vol 6, Issue 79 > To: [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 2:00 PM > > Send Phono-L mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://oldcrank.org/mailman/listinfo/phono-l > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Phono-L digest..." > > > If you reply, please change your subject line and don't include this entire > digest in your message. > > Today's Topics: > > 1. re Polyphone and Bettini Attachments (Mario Frazzetto) > 2. Edison Repeater ([email protected]) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:56:38 +0200 > From: Mario Frazzetto <[email protected]> > Subject: [Phono-L] re Polyphone and Bettini Attachments > To: Phono-L <[email protected]>, Phonolist > <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Hey Guys, > > Putting it out there. I will pay a good price to add something Bettini > and/or Polyphone to my collection. > Email me at: [email protected] > > Cheers, > Mario > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:37:02 -0400 > From: [email protected] > Subject: [Phono-L] Edison Repeater > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > I'm in need of a repeater for a "Triumph."? The upper pulley is > not necessary, but I will purchase complete/on "Triumph" mechanism if > necessary.? Can anyone help me?? Thanks - - > > George Paul > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org > > End of Phono-L Digest, Vol 6, Issue 79 > ************************************** > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org > > > **************New Low Prices on Dell Laptops ? Starting at $399 > (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1220631247x1201390185/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fad.doubl > eclick.net%2Fclk%3B213540506%3B35046329%3Bx) > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org From [email protected] Fri Apr 3 05:18:30 2009 From: [email protected] (Glenn Longwell) Date: Fri Apr 3 05:18:36 2009 Subject: [Phono-L] Lyric Phonograph update References: <462383480.7659671237344222799.javamail.r...@sz0019a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Well folks, I believe we have most, if not all,?of our answers to put this to rest.? This is most certainly not a Columbia product.? As for tonearms on the 3 machines we've seen pictures of it would appear none of them are original.? They did, in fact,?commercially produce this phonograph with a rubber tonearm.? So my guess is that these didn't last and were eventually replaced.? They were announced April 1916 in Talking Machine World.? I don't know exactly when they stopped yet but by February 1917 they were no longer producing them. My two remaining questions are 1) when did they stop, which requires further research which I didn't have time for when I got this most recent information and 2) how can we identify the reproducer they used?? The ad shows it listed as a "Lyric Reproducer" and they claim they made all their own parts but there's not a good enough picture to know how to identify one.? If they only fit the rubber tonearms perhaps they are all gone as well??? Anyone have any Lyric reproducers that seem to fit no other machine? Full story here with article and ad from April 1916: www.majesticrecord.com/lyricphono.htm Regards, Glenn From [email protected] Fri Apr 3 06:48:21 2009 From: [email protected] ([email protected]) Date: Fri Apr 3 06:48:27 2009 Subject: [Phono-L] Lyric Phonograph update In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> Message-ID: <141482941.2289591238766501299.javamail.r...@sz0019a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> Thanks for the update Glenn, your link below keeps coming up Not Found. Could you check this to see if it is correct? Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glenn Longwell" <[email protected]> To: "Antique Phonograph List" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 3, 2009 8:18:30 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [Phono-L] Lyric Phonograph update Well folks, I believe we have most, if not all, of our answers to put this to rest. This is most certainly not a Columbia product. As for tonearms on the 3 machines we've seen pictures of it would appear none of them are original. They did, in fact, commercially produce this phonograph with a rubber tonearm. So my guess is that these didn't last and were eventually replaced. They were announced April 1916 in Talking Machine World. I don't know exactly when they stopped yet but by February 1917 they were no longer producing them. My two remaining questions are 1) when did they stop, which requires further research which I didn't have time for when I got this most recent information and 2) how can we identify the reproducer they used? The ad shows it listed as a "Lyric Reproducer" and they claim they made all their own parts but there's not a good enough picture to know how to identify one. If they only fit the rubber tonearms perhaps they are all gone as well?? Anyone have any Lyric reproducers that seem to fit no other machine? Full story here with article and ad from April 1916: www.majesticrecord.com/lyricphono.htm Regards, Glenn _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org From [email protected] Fri Apr 3 07:10:49 2009 From: [email protected] (Glenn Longwell) Date: Fri Apr 3 07:10:56 2009 Subject: [Phono-L] Lyric Phonograph update References: <141482941.2289591238766501299.javamail.r...@sz0019a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Not sure what the problem is on your end.? Works for me. Also, someone had mentioned Stewart in the previous thread on this.? I found an article on them in January 1916 issue of Talking Machine World saying they were to make phonographs.? So in case someone was interested in dating those if it wasn't already known it would be early 1916 as the earliest date. Glenn ? ________________________________ From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: Antique Phonograph List <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 3, 2009 9:48:21 AM Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Lyric Phonograph update Thanks for the update Glenn, your link below keeps coming up Not Found. Could you check this to see if it is correct? Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glenn Longwell" <[email protected]> To: "Antique Phonograph List" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 3, 2009 8:18:30 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [Phono-L] Lyric Phonograph update Well folks, I believe we have most, if not all, of our answers to put this to rest. This is most certainly not a Columbia product. As for tonearms on the 3 machines we've seen pictures of it would appear none of them are original. They did, in fact, commercially produce this phonograph with a rubber tonearm. So my guess is that these didn't last and were eventually replaced. They were announced April 1916 in Talking Machine World. I don't know exactly when they stopped yet but by February 1917 they were no longer producing them. My two remaining questions are 1) when did they stop, which requires further research which I didn't have time for when I got this most recent information and 2) how can we identify the reproducer they used? The ad shows it listed as a "Lyric Reproducer" and they claim they made all their own parts but there's not a good enough picture to know how to identify one. If they only fit the rubber tonearms perhaps they are all gone as well?? Anyone have any Lyric reproducers that seem to fit no other machine? Full story here with article and ad from April 1916: www.majesticrecord.com/lyricphono.htm Regards, Glenn _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org From [email protected] Sat Apr 4 17:43:25 2009 From: [email protected] (Ron L'Herault) Date: Sat Apr 4 17:44:17 2009 Subject: [Phono-L] wire wound link cord -DD reproducers Message-ID: <dfdcaf7ddcc5416c9162e7fe02a77...@ronlherault> The Edisonic reproducers that I have seen have fine wire wound along the length of the cord linking diaphragm to needle bar. Why? Was it to make the cord stronger? Was it for some sonic reason or for another reason I have not though of? Ron L
