That attempt at scat just made me embarrassed for him! -----Original Message----- From: "DanKj" <ediso...@verizon.net> Sender: phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:32:38 To: Antique Phonograph List<phono-l@oldcrank.org> Reply-To: Antique Phonograph List <phono-l@oldcrank.org> Subject: [Phono-L] Charleston by Whiteman's O
The same voice made a four syllable reappearance on "Charlestonette", 4 months later. I assume he was a band member. Here's Charleston, take 5, which has no vocal effects. There are a couple of overmodulated moments, so maybe that's why this take wasn't used. http://www.box.net/shared/m8niz5c5ml ----- Original Message ----- From: <john9...@pacbell.net> > Yeah that is actually funny! > -----Original Message----- > From: William Zucca <rochr...@gmail.com> > > Personally, I never liked the Whiteman version because of the lame try at > scat singing. I understand that there is a Whiteman version without vocal, > but I have never heard it. > > Grnmountain Bill > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:38 PM, <john9...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> I still have a copy of the Whiteman version but I am not that impressed by >> it. I might sell it too. _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
