That comment about the phonograph playing galled me, too. Very reckless scholarship IMHO. Does she visualize that a ship that size sank in less than 1:30! LOL!
> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:07:57 -0700 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] shipwrecked phonograph and records > > I think to someone like this researcher, who seems not to be aware that these > records sold in the thousands, they must seem like rare gems. > And that line about perhaps they were playing the phonograph as the ship went > down, I think that's the last thing I'd be doing at a moment like that! > John Robles > > --- On Mon, 3/28/11, David Dazer <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: David Dazer <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] shipwrecked phonograph and records > To: "Antique Phonograph List" <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, March 28, 2011, 2:41 PM > > Very interesting. Seems silly to try to "recapture" the old sounds, since > the records were mass produced. Surely if the titles can be identified, > similar records could be found. Or, am I not understanding something? > Dave > > --- On Mon, 3/28/11, Andrew Baron <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Andrew Baron <[email protected]> > Subject: [Phono-L] shipwrecked phonograph and records > To: "Antique Phonograph List" <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, March 28, 2011, 5:19 PM > > Did anyone catch this? > http://www.montrealgazette.com/technology/Shipwrecked+music/4509626/story.html > > Andy Baron > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org > _______________________________________________ > Phono-L mailing list > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org _______________________________________________ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
