On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:06 AM, avdhesh .java <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have integrated dojo 1.3.2 with the PhotArk. > > Have a look..
Thanks for taking a shot at this! I don't like the idea of having a copy of all of the Dojo and Dijit source files in our own repo, though. Apart from cluttering up our repo unnecessarily, it makes it that much harder to associate what we have with a specific version of Dojo, and opens up the possibility of someone modifying individual files such that we don't match a specific version of Dojo at all. We should be able to explode only what we need over the webapp image, specifically excluding the raw source files. We would not want to deploy all those individual files anyway. Another option to consider might be to simply reference Dojo via a public CDN and not check anything in at all. -- Martin Cooper > Thanks and Regards > Avdhesh > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:37 PM, avdhesh .java <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > As per my understanding of jira issue PhotArk-6.We want to replace the >> > Tuscany implementation Widget and it's generated javascript with a third >> > party java script framework for json-rpc. My plan is to use Dojo as third >> > party JS framework and replace all the Tuscany generated >> > javascript(gallery.js ,scaDomain.js etc) from the gallary.html. >> > Instead use Dojo scripts for accessing remote gallery and album remote >> > JSON-RPC services. >> > >> > Please correct me if my understanding is incorrect..And also suggest me >> the >> > right Path so that i can work on this issue... >> > >> >> Great, exactly... >> There are some examples here that might help speed up things a little bit: >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sandbox/sca-cloud-tutorial/store-appengine-webapp/war/store.html >> >> >> -- >> Luciano Resende >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >> > > > > -- > Thanks, > Avdhesh > 09873421630 > > Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my > employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental. > Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic. The > question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is > left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of the > reader is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. (A discussion > of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the scope of this > article.) >
