On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Martin Cooper <[email protected]> wrote: >>> There are quite a few references to EFIX, eFix and efix in the code >>> right now. To the best of my knowledge, there is no such thing, and >>> they should all be EXIF instead. However, the capitalisation of the >>> middle one (eFix) makes me wonder if I'm wrong and there is in fact >>> something called eFix that I just haven't heard of before, so I don't >>> want to go changing them all without asking. Can someone enlighten me? >>> TIA. >>> >>> -- >>> Martin Cooper >>> >> >> This all started with me doing the initial confusion in the JIRA, and >> it looks like it polluted the code as well... >> Let me review it and bring then to the proper EXIF. >> >> > > This should be fixed in #912291. Please let me know if you still see > any typos when referencing EXIF.
Looks good. Thanks. I just wasn't sure enough to fix it myself. :-) -- Martin Cooper > Note that there is still one interface from Sanselan that is using > mixed case (ExifTagConstants). > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
