Yes Instead of using HashMap for saving the Images save the URL of the allbum into the JCR repository.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]>wrote: > On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Subash Chaturanga <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi all , > > > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Avdhesh Yadav <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> check this thread. > >> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00784.html > > > > > > The first patch i submitted stores each subscribed albums in a java > > collection .So based on that, for the next step, I went through the above > > discussion and what i feel was to store the meta data > > (location,name,description) of images in a JCR node. As, a JCR property > can > > hold multiple values, I think we can store each album as a property and > we > > can have two nodes for flicker and picasa . So that when we want to show > > them in gallery we can retrieve those data and on the fly create albums > and > > show them in the gallery. I would like to know, if anything wrong with > this > > approach or is there any better way to do this? > > > > > > > > > > I'd recommend following the same node structure as the "local JCR" > albums, which the exception that when it's a subscription, the actual > image is stored remotely and we only have it's URL. > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > -- Avdhesh Yadav http://www.avdheshyadav.com http://twitter.com/yadavavdhesh
