On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Subash Chaturanga <[email protected]> wrote: > > "Partitioning the JCR to better differentiate these albums " , as I feel > without directly storing them in the root level we can have two nodes called > local and remote. And inside remote we can have picasa and flicker and then > put albums in the typical way.But this would cause to change considerable > amount of code which already acting based on the root level albums. So what > I was trying to do is store them in the root level as now and view them in > gallery any how. Wonder what is the best way, either to keep this as it is > or modify the JCR album structure. > >
In the REST branch, I think I had used "Albums" and "RemoteAlbums" as root for different types of albums. As for a lot of code changes, if you make "gallery" to be an aggregator of Albums and RemoteAlbums, there might be no side effects bubbled up to the ui, thus not a lot of change ? The issue is that the code is getting more and more complicated to maintain it. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
