Hi Suhothayan,, Yes, my initial idea is to have privacy visibility defined per tag. Do you have any other suggestion?
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Suhothayan Sriskandarajah < [email protected]> wrote: > On 15 November 2010 00:49, Adriano Crestani <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > It would be great to understand the difference between high and low > > level here, particular because I don't think we need a very complex > > and deep API. > > > > High = API exposed as SOA service > > Low = API used by the service implementation to manipulate images and > tags > > > > You mentioned these are low level, then Gallery really seems high > > level. How about PhotoStream ? > > > > Gallery is low level according to the description I just gave above :) If > > you want to rename it to PhotoStream, for me it's OK. > > > > I'm not sure about the tag operations. Shouldn't this be like an > > "update" to the image "metadata" where you add a new tag to it ? > > > > That sounds reasonable too :) > > > > I'm not sure I understand this. To me, subscription and the actual > > gallery are decoupled. > > > > The sync operation needs to push the images retrieved from remote > provider > > to a gallery. > > > > Seems good > +1 > > And i also suggest to think about the big picture, how we can provide > security throught this. > Therefore we can implement security after this is done > > Are we going to secure albums based on album tags ? > > Regards > Suho > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > It would be great to understand the difference between high and low > > > level here, particular because I don't think we need a very complex > > > and deep API. > > > > > >
