On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Suhothayan Sriskandarajah < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 24 January 2011 06:45, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Suhothayan Sriskandarajah > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 24 January 2011 00:51, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >> We are almost done with M3 release, pending one vote in the IPMC list, > > >> and I was wondering if we should start thinking about a roadmap for > > >> our next releases, aiming a 1.0 release. > > >> > > >> Great > > > > > > PhotArk Core > > >> - Complete PhotArk API (REST Branch) > > >> - Create a PhotArk JS API > > >> - Simplify Authorization using SCA Policies > > >> > > > > > > Are we going to implement all these in the current REST Branch? > > > > > > > It's open for discussion, but one approach could be that we start > > migrating pieces of what we have to the REST branch, and we then make > > it TRUNK (moving current trunk to a branch or something) > > > > +1 > > > But please, feel free to suggest new items to the roadmap, and > > different approaches for implementing it. > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > We can Improve the gallery UI > and show both local and remote albums together. > Hi, as a initial step to improve the gallery UI, the JIRA I created to change the local JCR structure, which is almost finish, can be useful. Then I can finish issue, provide UI subscriptions to remote albums, which i have already submitted a patch ASAP. Then, the local structure separate local and remote albums clearly. I think then, how about providing facebook albums subscriptions other than flicker and picasa, as almost evreybody have a facebook account ? > But I'm not sure how we are going to manager user > access permissions for remote albums, That we need to discuss. > > Suho > > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende > > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > -- sk
