ID:               48607
 Comment by:       b dot vontobel at meteonews dot ch
 Reported By:      karachi at mail dot ru
 Status:           Verified
 Bug Type:         Streams related
 Operating System: FreeBSD
 PHP Version:      5.2.10
 New Comment:

Just stumbled across this (still in 5.3.1) a few days ago, trying to 
transmit data to three different FTP servers. One of the servers 
_never_ got a file, one got files, but in 9 out of 10 runs the last 
part of the files was cut off, only the last one got the files intact 
in about 8 of 10 runs (with the others also corrupted).

I didn't find this bug report at first and so I opened up the PHP 
source for the first time in my life and was rather shocked: There's 
really no way that write operations using the ftp stream wrapper ever 
could've worked. If it works, it's out of pure luck. Was this never 
tested?

The problem is, that FTP (see RFC959) uses the tear down of the 
_data_stream_ as its EOF marker. What this code does on the other 
hand, is just send a QUIT on the control stream and then tear down 
that one. So from the perspective of the FTP server it looks like an 
abort (transmission still in progress, but control channel lost). Now 
it just depends on the implementation of the server and sometimes some

random timing issues (which TCP close is handled first) what the 
outcome is: Some FTP servers just annihilate everything that was 
transmitted so far (realizing it was a client abort during 
transmission or a network glitch - and the file probably corrupted 
anyway), others keep what they got so far. Only sometimes (out of 
luck) they maybe get the close on the data stream first and are still 
able to send the okay on the control stream (which is not handled by 
the current code, but what sjoerd added in his first idea of a patch).

Now, I'm not really familiar with the PHP stream wrapper API at all, 
but below is my imagination of how this code could be made to work (I 
actually run it on a 30+ vhosts cluster): If we were only reading from

the stream, it's probably okay to not care about a clean shutdown 
(especially because in this code part nothing really tells us reliably

what exact state the FTP session is in). But if we have written to the

FTP server, we MUST close the data stream first, then wait for a 
confirmation from the server - and only then both of us know, the data

was sent completely:

--- php-5.3.1/ext/standard/ftp_fopen_wrapper.c  2008-12-31 
11:15:49.000000000 +0000
+++
php-5.3.1-ftp_fopen_wrapper_patch/ext/standard/ftp_fopen_wrapper.c      
2009-12-16 18:41:07.000000000 +0000
@@ -97,14 +97,33 @@
  */
 static int php_stream_ftp_stream_close(php_stream_wrapper *wrapper, 
php_stream *stream TSRMLS_DC)
 {
+       int ret = 0, result = 0;
+       char tmp_line[512];
        php_stream *controlstream = (php_stream *)stream->wrapperdata;
-       
+
+       /* For write modes close data stream first to signal EOF to 
server */
+       if (strpbrk(stream->mode, "wa+")) {
+               if (stream && controlstream) {
+                       php_stream_close(stream);
+                       stream = NULL;
+
+                       result = GET_FTP_RESULT(controlstream);
+                       if (result != 226 && result != 250) {
+                               php_error_docref(NULL TSRMLS_CC, 
E_WARNING, "FTP server reports %s", tmp_line);
+                               ret = EOF;
+                       }
+               } else {
+                       php_error_docref(NULL TSRMLS_CC, E_WARNING, 
"Broken streams to FTP server");
+                       ret = EOF;
+               }
+       }
+
        if (controlstream) {
                php_stream_write_string(controlstream, "QUIT\r\n");
                php_stream_close(controlstream);
-               stream->wrapperdata = NULL;
+               controlstream = NULL;
        }
-       return 0;
+       return ret;
 }
 /* }}} */
 
@@ -563,8 +582,9 @@
                goto errexit;
        }
 
-       /* remember control stream */   
+       /* remember control stream and mode */  
        datastream->wrapperdata = (zval *)stream;
+       strcpy(datastream->mode, mode); 
 
        php_url_free(resource);
        return datastream;

Now, I'd be very happy if somebody more familiar with the PHP API's 
could have a glance at this patch, maybe do some fine-tuning and then 
apply it and hopefully close this bug.

I especially scratched my head regarding access to the mode of the 
stream and regarding error handling: Mode seems to be handled locally 
only in php_stream_url_wrap_ftp() and then to be discarded. I didn't 
see a cleaner and quicker way than to overwrite the mode in the stream

from php_stream_xport_create() which seems to always be "r+", hoping 
to not break something elsewhere. Where would the clean way be to keep

such things or get them from in this API? Is there some usable 
internals documentation? Or should I add some struct's to 
abstract/wrapperdata? But this quickly looked like changing _a_lot_ 
throughout this whole code...

Then the error handling: From what I see in the code, 
php_stream_wrapper_log_error() would probably be the correct way? But 
I couldn't make it work (and would need access to the "context", 
that's handed over to the other functions, but not to close). I could 
also not get PHP's fclose() to return a failure. From some glances 
through the rest of the code, on all the higher levels, 
success/failure is just discarded? Despite the manual that says 
"Returns TRUE on success or FALSE on failure.". Is it really just not 
possible to get a FALSE value out of fclose within this API if I 
couldn't close my streams? So am I just plain stupid if I check the 
return values of PHP functions in my PHP code, because they're really 
just hardcoded to TRUE? I'm really sorry about being so ranty and 
would love to help, but it just looks like quite a few things are 
broken around here -- I should probably add some more bug reports.

Currently I just used php_error_docref() to at least get a warning 
through to the top-level and hope that somebody familiar with this API

can add a real solution. While my patch fixes the primary issue and 
catches errors, the PHP code still thinks it successfully wrote its 
data...


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2009-08-25 17:45:17] sjo...@php.net

The solution may be something like this, although this may break things
when the current transaction is not about to send a 226 Transfer
complete.

Index: ext/standard/ftp_fopen_wrapper.c
===================================================================
--- ext/standard/ftp_fopen_wrapper.c    (revision 287652)
+++ ext/standard/ftp_fopen_wrapper.c    (working copy)
@@ -97,7 +97,16 @@
  */
 static int php_stream_ftp_stream_close(php_stream_wrapper *wrapper,
php_stream *stream TSRMLS_DC)
 {
+       int result;
+       char tmp_line[512];
+
        php_stream *controlstream = (php_stream *)stream->wrapperdata;
+
+       result = GET_FTP_RESULT(controlstream);
+       if (result != 226 && result != 250) {
+               // Maybe throw a warning?
+               return 1;
+       }
        
        if (controlstream) {
                php_stream_write_string(controlstream, "QUIT\r\n");


------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2009-08-25 16:33:02] sjo...@php.net

I could reproduce the QUIT before the transfer being complete.

FTP     Request: STOR /a.php
FTP     Response: 150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for /a.php
FTP     Request: QUIT
FTP     Response: 226 Transfer complete

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2009-08-25 08:28:23] sjo...@php.net

You can use a pastebin or e-mail it to sjoerd-php at linuxonly dot nl.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2009-08-18 16:24:58] karachi at mail dot ru

I mean I captured data but I can't attach them to the bug

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2009-08-18 16:23:58] karachi at mail dot ru

Where can I save captured ftp data?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at
    http://bugs.php.net/48607

-- 
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=48607&edit=1

Reply via email to