ID:               48082
 Comment by:       quakvorgus at yahoo dot com
 Reported By:      andrew dot answer at gmail dot com
 Status:           Assigned
 Bug Type:         MySQL related
 Operating System: win32 only - Windows XP
 PHP Version:      5.3.0RC1
 Assigned To:      mysql
 New Comment:

Confirming what andrew wrote.
@kulakov74: Thanks for the information. Setting mysql.default_socket =
mysql does not solve the issue for me.
Will have to switch to tcp connections instead of using named pipes.
Please, the official documentation should be updated about this change
from php 5.2 to 5.3.


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2010-02-02 07:07:14] peaceable_whale at hotmail dot com

I have the same problem using PHP 5.3.1 on IIS 7.5 w/FastCGI and MySQL
5.1.43. Is there any update on this issue?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2009-10-20 19:56:25] kulakov74 at yandex dot ru

I confirm this with the just installed PHP 5.3.0 on Win XP, I used to
use pipes and had skip-networking in my my.ini, I still can connect with
mysql.exe, but PHP does not connect this way any more - I had to comment
out skip-networking and set the right port in mysql.default_port = 3306
(PHP used to work without it when I used TCP long ago). 
Yes, the dot does not work any more, as if it cannot be resolved to
localhost. 
If I have mysql.default_socket = mysql in my php.ini, mysqlnd connects
to localhost via UNIX socket, otherwise it uses TCP. 

I agree these things are not critical, yet they have to be mentioned or
explained somewhere. 

Got some info on pipes here: http://blog.ulf-wendel.de/?p=157
(comments)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2009-06-29 09:43:02] andrew dot answer at gmail dot com

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/832714/mysql-named-pipes-on-windows-
faster-best-practice-or-bad-idea

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2009-06-29 09:40:48] andrew dot answer at gmail dot com

regarding performance

http://www.google.ru/search?
rlz=1C1GGLS_ruRU305RU305&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=named+pipes+speed

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg77837.html

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa178138(SQL.80).aspx

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2009-06-29 08:42:28] uwendel at mysql dot com

Aren't named pipes considerable slower than TCP/IP: why use named pipes
?! I won't work on named pipe support for mysqlnd, if its slower, which
is the case AFAIK.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at
    http://bugs.php.net/48082

-- 
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=48082&edit=1

Reply via email to