Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=62397&edit=1

 ID:                 62397
 Comment by:         isee at a dot troll
 Reported by:        spamik at yum dot pl
 Summary:            disable_functions = eval does not work
 Status:             Re-Opened
 Type:               Feature/Change Request
 Package:            *General Issues
 PHP Version:        5.3.14
 Block user comment: N
 Private report:     N

 New Comment:

@anon: pretty sure you just got trolled


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-06-28 17:37:40] anon at anon dot anon

@e756937

(1) haven't you heard of include()?
(2) $_GET['path'] not validated
(3) no apparent rhyme or reason to mix of single and double quoting
(4) echo parameter neither quoted nor escaped
(5) echo within eval?
(6) why do you need eval for that at all?
(7) "I also use it for user auth" -- I completely doubt you need to.
(8) exec() is unrelated.
(9) The mere existence of an easy way to disable eval does not mean your host 
will do that. Your host can already disable it if they want to. Hosts often let 
you specify a custom php.ini or other configuration anyway, and this is 
certainly true on a server plan that serves 10k daily uniques for you.
(10) Using a 10minutemail.com address with a commenting system that doesn't 
verify the email.

Conclusion => magic_quotes level of IQ

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-06-26 17:59:39] e756937 at rtrtr dot com

I run a website with 10k uniques per day and eval() is CRUCIAL to my business

example:
$page = file_get_contents($_GET['path'].".php");
eval("echo ".$page.";");

I also use it for user auth and access to exec() since my host blocks it

As you can see, eval() is a very good thing to use and I don't want it gone, 
kk??

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-06-24 13:58:06] spamik at yum dot pl

good point about assert and preg_replace /e - there also should be option to 
disable it then (especialy this /e in preg_replace). Writers of malicious code 
so far did not had to use it because eval is enabled in every php version...
As for eval etc. documentation states that it sould be avoided by developers - 
and it is actualy. However it used to mask infected, malicious code by those 
that hacked php software. eval is commonly used to evaluate base64_encoded 
string and that makes very hard to see what code is doing and to detect it 
automaticly (by something like antivirus software).
Change on magic_quotes_gpc in php 5.4 is much greater change then turning off 
eval by default would be. Since most legitimate software don't use it (since 
documentation says its bad)would affect only very few. This also would not 
increase security. However it would make code infections so much easier to 
detect and analize its nature.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-06-24 11:25:51] ni...@php.net

Irregardless of the FR, I'd like to point out that eval() is a useful and 
legitimate language construct. It *definitely* will not be disabled by default. 
I won't argue with the fact that it is commonly misused by ignorant developers, 
but this does not mean that eval() itself is in any way fundamentally "evil".

Also, I completely do not understand your arguments that people are migrating 
to other languages, because PHP has an eval() construct. All dynamic languages 
have an eval() function, including JS, Python and Ruby.

Furthermore you should realize that disabling eval() will not likely improve 
the security of your application. There are just to many other ways to execute 
code. E.g. the assert() function can be used to evaluate arbitrary code. Or the 
preg_replace /e modifier.

But in any case, I don't really see why eval() is a language construct. In my 
eyes it could just as well be a function. This would make it disableable and 
would also provide other advantages, like allowing its use as a callback 
function.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-06-24 10:05:00] larue...@php.net

okey, change to FR makes sense to me.

------------------------------------------------------------------------


The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at

    https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=62397


-- 
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=62397&edit=1

Reply via email to