Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=50029&edit=1
ID: 50029
Comment by: worldoffame at hotmail dot com
Reported by: marc dot gray at gmail dot com
Summary: Weird invoke issue on class as property
Status: Analyzed
Type: Feature/Change Request
Package: Class/Object related
Operating System: Ubuntu 9.04
PHP Version: 5.3.0
Block user comment: N
Private report: N
New Comment:
Any updates on this? I hope it gets fixed asap, cant believe this bug has been
around for 3+ years and still left untouched. *sigh*
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-06-08 12:24:34] programmierung at pfink dot de
The worst thing on this bug is that is_callable() returns true in this case
even though it's not callable:
The lines
if(is_callable($this->objectWithInvokeMethod))
return $this->objectWithInvokeMethod(0);
produce the fatal error
Fatal error: Call to undefined method MyClass::objectWithInvokeMethod()
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2011-12-06 16:34:31] karsten at typo3 dot org
I would go for simple rules to solve this. When having a class and calling
$this->prop() PHP should
* use __invoke on $this->prop if there is no method prop() in the class
* if there is an actual method, the method takes precedence
In the latter one can still use $this->prop->__invoke(), but should probably
rather clean up the code. :)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2011-08-24 18:49:06] marc dot gray at gmail dot com
I've been thinking about this since the same issue appears to exist with
assigning a closure to a static
variable too (tested in 5.3.5, 5.3.8 & 5.4alpha3.
//----------------------------------
// Create a very basic static class
class closureProperty {
static public $myClosure;
}
// Assign a closure to a class property
closureProperty::$myClosure = function() { echo('Hi'); };
// Fatal error: Function name must be a string
closureProperty::$myClosure();
// Works as expected
$safeCopy = closureProperty::$myClosure;
$safeCopy();
//----------------------------------
I can understand why it happens with dynamic properties, apparently you can
have a variable and function named
identically? I admit I've never tried.
I would propose making identically named variables and functions as deprecated
(does anyone who's any good
actually do that? Talk about poor readability...) and implement a collision
warning in the mean time. I would
also suggest this makes less sense in a static case (due to $ variable prefix)
than it did in a dynamic case,
and should be changed.
If nothing else, some discussion on the matter would be lovely.
Thoughts?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2011-02-07 22:36:54] dhaarbrink at gmail dot com
@bkarwin: The control would be passed to __call(), since there is no way to
disambiguate. __call() would then be responsible for deciding what to do.
I have to agree with Matthew, it's a huge WTF. It just doesn't work as it
should (that's beyond what is expected).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2010-04-07 20:22:38] [email protected]
How would Matthew's suggestion work if a magic __call() method is present?
class b {
private $x;
public function __call($method, $args) { echo "Called\n"; }
function __construct() {
$this->x = new a();
$this->x();
}
}
Should this execute $this->__call("x") and output "Called" or should it execute
$this->x->__invoke() and output "Invoked"?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=50029
--
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=50029&edit=1
