ID: 25701
Updated by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported By: scottmacvicar at ntlworld dot com
Status: Verified
Bug Type: Apache2 related
Operating System: *
PHP Version: 4CVS
New Comment:
&& != AND (but it doesn't make any difference in this script,
just wanted to mention it's wrong :)
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2003-09-30 14:44:20] kier at ap3d dot com
Can you explain *why* using 'AND' instead of '&&' is wrong here?
Both 'AND' and '&&' have left associativity and with no other logical
operators in the expression, precedence should not be an issue...
right?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2003-09-30 14:25:16] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
btw. using AND here is wrong, you should use &&:
if (strpos(' ' . $_SERVER['HTTP_ACCEPT_ENCODING'], 'gzip') !== false
AND !headers_sent())
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2003-09-30 09:56:26] scottmacvicar at ntlworld dot com
Description:
------------
Calling flush in Apache and Apache 2 produce different results.
Within Apache after calling flush you can still send headers as the
output buffer prevents it from actually being flushed.
Within Apache 2 after calling flush you can no longer send headers even
though headers_sent still returns false.
Reproduce code:
---------------
<?php
ob_start();
echo 'test';
flush();
$newtext = ob_get_clean();
if (strpos(' ' . $_SERVER['HTTP_ACCEPT_ENCODING'], 'gzip') !== false
AND !headers_sent())
{
header('Content-Encoding: gzip');
$newtext = gzencode($newtext, 1);
}
header('Content-Length: ' . strlen($newtext));
echo $newtext;
?>
Expected result:
----------------
test
Actual result:
--------------
binary data
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=25701&edit=1
