ID:               29349
 Comment by:       adconrad at debian dot org
 Reported By:      k at ailis dot de
 Status:           Bogus
 Bug Type:         GD related
 Operating System: Linux
 PHP Version:      4CVS-2004-07-23 (stable)
 New Comment:

I'm not entirely sure which planet you're from, but a double-free bug
from incorrect usage of a library is not a "bogus" bug.

Distributions link to external libraries because symbol clashes in
shared application space is BAD (and your internal library doesn't use
versioned symbols) and because security updates to a dozen statically
compiled packages is much more of a pain in the ass than security
updates to an individual library.

If you don't want distributions to package your stuff, get a consensus
from your contributors and slap a more restructive license on it.  If
you do want it being used widely, get rid of your NIH attitude and
realise that YOU bundled libgd, they didn't "steal" it from you and
"break" it.  It's your bundled version that you broke to work around a
bug in PHP, rather than fixing the PHP bug.  That's not sane.


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2004-07-25 21:42:11] k at ailis dot de

Then why are you not modifying your configure system so it 
checks to have at least GD 2.0.21 if the external GD lib 
is used? If you are argumenting that everyone should use 
the bundled GD lib anyway then you don't need to bother 
with those poor users which are not having at least GD 
2.0.21. 
 
But if you don't want to "exclude" users of older GD 
libraries and you think it's ok that these users are not 
able to use some PHP functions without segfaults then you 
can do some conditional compiling. In that way you can 
help users by saying "Update to GD 2.0.21 or better and 
recompile PHP OR use the bundled GD" instead of insisting 
only on the usage of the bundled one. 
 
But slowly the impression comes to me that you don't want 
users to use the external GD. You are already no longer 
giving support for the usage of the external one (At least 
nothing else then the silly "use the bundled GD library" 
response which does not respect the fact that the user may 
have reasons to use the external library). So maybe you 
should be consequential and remove compilation support for 
the external GD completely. Then you have no longer to 
deal with bug reports like this...

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2004-07-25 21:10:18] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The patch relies on a function only available in later 
versions of GD, which not everyone has. The bundled GD has 
no problem what so over and should be used. 

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2004-07-25 20:54:32] k at ailis dot de

Narf... This is NOT a bug in the GD library. The function 
you are using is freeing memory because this function is 
MEANT to do exactly this because this function normally 
deals with data which was allocated by GD itself. But you 
are passing data to this function which was allocated by 
YOU. Boutell has already dealt with this problem and has 
created new functions which exactly suit your needs: The 
gdImageCreateFrom*Ptr functions and also the 
gdNewDynamicCtxEx function. RTFM: 
 
  * The new gdNewDynamicCtxEx function was added to 
support the easy 
       implementation of the above functions and to 
correct a design 
       problem which made life unpleasant for those 
passing in memory not 
       originally allocated by gd to the gdNewDynamicCtx 
function by 
       providing a way to specify that gd should never 
free or reallocate 
       a particular block of memory. The gdNewDynamicCtx 
function and its 
       relatives, although still exported for ABI 
compatibility, are now 
       deprecated except for internal use, in favor of 
       [45]gdImageCreateFromPngPtr and its relatives. 
 
So please stop putting your head in the sand and apply 
Adam Conrad's patch or move to the new 
gdImageCreateFrom*Ptr functions.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2004-07-25 19:28:39] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sorry, but your problem does not imply a bug in PHP itself.  For a
list of more appropriate places to ask for help using PHP, please
visit http://www.php.net/support.php as this bug system is not the
appropriate forum for asking support questions. 

Thank you for your interest in PHP.

This is a bug in the GD library, we recommend to always use 
the bundled GD library, which as you've indicated does not 
have this problem. 

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2004-07-25 15:21:35] adconrad at debian dot org

As of the next upload to the Debian archive, we will be using the
following patch, which seems to clear up every php4-gd segfault bug
we've had reported:

--- php4-4.3.8/ext/gd/gd.c.orig 2004-07-24 06:00:25.000000000 -0600
+++ php4-4.3.8/ext/gd/gd.c      2004-07-24 06:10:38.000000000 -0600
@@ -1242,7 +1242,7 @@
 #ifdef HAVE_GD_WBMP
        else {
                gdIOCtx *io_ctx;
-               io_ctx = gdNewDynamicCtx (8, data);
+               io_ctx = gdNewDynamicCtxEx (8, data, 0);
                if (io_ctx) {
                        if (getmbi((int(*)(void*))gdGetC, io_ctx) == 0
&& skipheader((int(*)(void*))gdGetC, io_ctx) == 0 ) {
 #if HAVE_LIBGD204
@@ -1274,7 +1274,7 @@
        gdImagePtr im;
        gdIOCtx *io_ctx;

-       io_ctx = gdNewDynamicCtx (Z_STRLEN_PP(data),
Z_STRVAL_PP(data));
+       io_ctx = gdNewDynamicCtxEx (Z_STRLEN_PP(data),
Z_STRVAL_PP(data), 0);

        if (!io_ctx) {
                return NULL;
@@ -1428,7 +1428,7 @@
                        goto out_err;
                }

-               io_ctx = gdNewDynamicCtx(buff_size, buff);
+               io_ctx = gdNewDynamicCtxEx(buff_size, buff, 0);
                if(!io_ctx) {
                        php_error_docref(NULL TSRMLS_CC,
E_WARNING,"Cannot allocate GD IO context");
                        goto out_err;

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at
    http://bugs.php.net/29349

-- 
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=29349&edit=1

Reply via email to