ID:               35288
 Updated by:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reported By:      webmaster at negeta dot com
 Status:           Assigned
 Bug Type:         ICONV related
 Operating System: FreeBSD 5.4
 PHP Version:      5CVS-2005-12-13
 Assigned To:      moriyoshi
 New Comment:

I've made a little update to the patch:
 * use PHP_ADD_LIBRARY_WITH_PATH, instead of PHP_ADD_LIBRARY and
PHP_ADD_LIBPATH
 * use $PHP_LIBDIR

BTW, this patch also fixes bug #33141.


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2006-01-01 13:57:18] webmaster at negeta dot com

I confirmed that the patch solves this problem.
Thanks!

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2006-01-01 13:31:34] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Patch: http://mega.ist.utl.pt/~ncpl/php_libiconv_solaris.txt

Explanation:
http://news.php.net/php.internals/21360

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2005-12-13 17:36:55] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

See also bug #35554


------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2005-12-12 13:29:46] webmaster at negeta dot com

I don't disagree that -lxml2 and -liconv are necessary for build iconv
extension.
I said "compile" as "compile configure:44150", and paste its log.
It only checks iconv() in the libc.
I think -liconv shouldn't exist here,
because it make to link to iconv library.

I understand the searching order as follows:
1. iconv() in the libc.
2. libiconv() in the libc.
3. libiconv() in the userland.
4. iconv() in the userland.
Because acinclude.m4 says
"Check libc first if no path is provided in --with-iconv."
Is this searching order wrong?

My system has libiconv() and iconv() in the userland.
(libiconv() is an alias of iconv().)
I think following behavior is correct:
1. and 2. fail, and 3. succeeds.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2005-12-11 23:47:38] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Well, then are you *really* sure that the userland function named
libiconv() is defined instead of iconv() in your build and that's the
case?

Regarding the issues you call "more basal things", -liconv is appended
to resolve libxml2 dependency there and so it's not a problem in the
iconv extension.

You always need to specify --with-iconv=[PREFIX] when the libc doesn't
have an iconv implementation nor no alternative can be found in the
default header search path (supposedly /usr/include).






------------------------------------------------------------------------

The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at
    http://bugs.php.net/35288

-- 
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=35288&edit=1

Reply via email to