ID: 38630
User updated by: dobes at lnx dot cz
Reported By: dobes at lnx dot cz
Status: Bogus
Bug Type: Performance problem
Operating System: winXP
PHP Version: 5.1.5
New Comment:
Yes, I agree, it have to be slower, but why 3 times? I change calling
$this->x = $this->g();
to direct calling
$this->x = mt_rand( $this->l, $this->h );
and it improve runtime from
0m6.060s to 0m4.538s ... it is too big difference when I change only
one calling of protected class function to the PHP internal.
I wrote this bug because I beleve in better performace of classes in
next PHP versions.
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2006-08-28 16:24:58] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are benchmarking totally different things.
<?php
function foo() {
bar();
}
foo();
?>
is always slower than
<?php
bar();
?>
in this universe.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2006-08-28 16:06:37] dobes at lnx dot cz
Description:
------------
I checked small benchmark described on
http://destiney.com/benchmarks/db_insert_select (wrote when PHP5.0.3
was current) and I get quite similar result ;-( But I checked PHP5.1.6
(this is not in your PHP version list).
I think bad perbormance of OOP code is bug and not feature.
Reproduce code:
---------------
look on http://destiney.com/benchmarks/db_insert_select, it's longer
than 20 lines.
Expected result:
----------------
Just shorter run-time of OOP code.
Actual result:
--------------
Runtime of OOP scriot is still 3x longer than proc code (the same as in
PHP5.0.3).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=38630&edit=1
